I hate to bring this up. But it is inevitable, you can't keep the same station logo forever.
Or maybe you can?
Let's face it, Natalie leaving Channel 5 is something of a final link to the 70s and 80s in Boston TV history. Channel 5's current logo was fresh and new in 1972. But it has been the same logo for nearly 35 years. Put another way, the last different logo that Channel 5 had was the very elegant WHDH 5. That's going back a long ways.
So the question is this, to those of you who know, and those of you who don't: Is it time for WCVB to reinvent their logo? Do we need a new 5? And, is anyone at Hearst-Argyle thinking about this too? At the other end of the spectrum woud this be a bad idea? Would we be talking about another CBS 4 to WBZ type situation? Would it turn off viewers?
What do you think?
Or maybe you can?
Let's face it, Natalie leaving Channel 5 is something of a final link to the 70s and 80s in Boston TV history. Channel 5's current logo was fresh and new in 1972. But it has been the same logo for nearly 35 years. Put another way, the last different logo that Channel 5 had was the very elegant WHDH 5. That's going back a long ways.
So the question is this, to those of you who know, and those of you who don't: Is it time for WCVB to reinvent their logo? Do we need a new 5? And, is anyone at Hearst-Argyle thinking about this too? At the other end of the spectrum woud this be a bad idea? Would we be talking about another CBS 4 to WBZ type situation? Would it turn off viewers?
What do you think?