I bought an Accurian a few months ago, laughed at it's behavior awhile and set it aside, as it sounds AWFUL on AM analog.
I noticed it last sunday night as I was getting ready for a trip to Fargo, ND.
It was under a box with CDs, the cover of an old JVC cassette deck, and some books.
I realized it wins the prize for "most useless radio I've ever owned", or "radio most quickly silted over by other junk".
This is because the AM analog is horrific. If it sounded as good as one of ANY of my other radios, I could use it,
but I won't listen to a radio so muffled as to be unintelligible.
In other words, they ruined the chances for me to be accepting of the digital reception, because they deliberately
made the analog sound so bad. There is no reason for there to be such huge, artificial difference between the two,
unless they are "sandbagging" the AM analog audio. I don't trust people who are dishonest, and presenting
AM reception that cuts off at 2.5 khz is dishonest unless you are selling a communications HF receiver with selectable bandwidth.
I have dozens of radios that sound better. They get used all the time.
The Accurian got used about 7 -10 days. I listened "at" it for a while, but never could listen "to" it.