Breaking it down.....
WNTIRadio said:
To address Tony, I don't hate dance music. I can respect it, and can see where/when it would be enjoyable. I've even listened to some of WEDX. Not my first choice, but I can see where people get in to it.
And that's fine. I'm not saying people that aren't fans have to love this music. But at least respect.
WNTIRadio said:
That said, you're delusional as to how popular it is. Go ask 50 people on the street to name 3-5 EDM artists. They'll probably name hip-hop, pop-dance people and possibly Deadmau5, because most people remember the mouse mask, not the actual music.
Depends on the 50 I ask. If I ask someone that's around our age demographics (I'm 46), they're not going to know. I only know because I am an extreme case of a dance/EDM music fan (I can admit that so I'm not THAT delusional, lol). MAYBE Swedish House Mafia at best. But if I ask a bunch of teens and twenty somethings, they can tell me Deadmau5, Avicii, Skrillex, Nero, Laidback Luke. You'd be very surprised.
WNTIRadio said:
Ask anyone to name 3-5 rock stars, heavy metal bands, rappers or country artists and they will be able to.
Of course, because radio floods that. Let's add R&B into this too for that matter. And when heavy metal was huge, sure of course. But in that case, I don't think twenty-somethings could name 3-5 heavy metal bands. MAYBE Metallica at best? Heavy metal is their parents music.
WNTIRadio said:
It's a niche. Be proud of your niche. But stop with this is the format that's going to take over the world. It isn't. Especially here in the USA. Sample Top-40 these days, the CHR music is swinging back towards rock/acoustic. The Lumineers, Mumford and Sons, Phillip Phillips, Of Monsters and Men, Fun., Taylor Swift, Imagine Dragons... none of those have a remotely EDM sound to them.
Find a quote anywhere on Radio Discussions where I've said that dance/EDM is going to take over the world. First off, if we are going to include the world into this, dance is HUGE. Dance IS pop. Regarding the U.S., the surge of the music has started taking off around 2009. The DJ culture has never been THIS HUGE in the U.S. There was even a recent picture of Taylor Swift (that you've mentioned above) behind "the decks"

. For the big cities where dance music has a strong following (New York, Boston, Miami, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Washington D.C.), those would be the places for such stations. Heck, even the Hudson Valley region of New York State with Drive FX has a good following. EDM has been on the growth.
WNTIRadio said:
I don't care how many coalitions you have, the reality is that it is not a broad appeal format. I understand and appreciate your passion, but sometime that passion blinds reality. It won't be a top 10 station in Boston. It will be lucky to get to a 1.5. If someone can effectively sell that niche audience, great. Going with some local talent would certainly help the station develop a more Boston flavor... Bostonians aren't exactly known for their acceptance of things that aren't Boston. But is CC willing to put the money in it? I bet no. The idea from the start was to put something cheap and easy on the frequency. I really think CC bought it just so nobody else could.
Passion....guilty as charged. It's very well known, perhaps to a "fault", in the dance music community. Not apologetic about it.
But if you want me to prove that I CAN be realistic...here we go. I KNOW this station is not going to be in the top 10, at least if they stick to what the format is now. And I'll give it to you with "niche" because if Evolution 101.7 just goes solely on the EDM aspect of dance music and not on others that have broad appeal potential, just because "EDM" is considered big, then it's going to fail, just like KDHT in Denver did not too long ago. That's where being "too niche" killed things.
I also know that there are more "casual" listeners out there than core fans of the music and we need them. And to throw Skrillex, Afrojack and Deadmau5 in their face up front without something that they're already used to (which is that "electro pop" aspect such as Calvin Harris/Florence Welch, Ne-Yo, Pitbull, Chris Brown, Rihanna) would not attract them to a station like Evolution 101.7.
As much as dance music fans may cringe on that last sentence, truth of the matter is that we
NEED that aspect, but not play it to the extent that CHR radio does so that our brand of dance (which also INCLUDES vocals such as Kim Sozzi, Nadia Ali, etc.) can get in. Definitely throw in the recurrents of dance from the past 10 years in there on occasion to keep that familiarity aspect. And yeah, EDM too but not to the extent that Evolution does it.
Local presence?
ABSOLUTELY! Give them locality. Make the station "Boston". Agree infinity on that one

Pandora, YouTube, internet branded streams that have no terrestrial presence cannot duplicate or be "local". That is the one thing terrestrial radio CAN do...be local.
I don't know if my thoughts get lost in the passion that I have on most folks but dance/EDM can be broad appeal. So as long as you don't lean the sound in one direction since you have so many genres out there.
I think I've satisfied the reality part here. ;D