• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Jen Brien Officially Gets WBZ-1030 Overnight Show

Vinnie,
Where did I say I even listen to her much or for that matter where did I say I liked her? I never said either. My point has always been "If you don't like it don't listen" and at the same time don't try to convert me to your way of thinking.
I do believe in being as fair and accurate as possible therefore it annoys the hell out of me when people post misinformation, unsubstantiated information or stuff that sounds like it belongs on a streetcorner such as "I wonder who she's sleeping with" or as another classy contributor posted that maybe Peter Casey" fell for her feminine wiles". Talk about classy people, there are many other examples in both of the Brien threads all made up and all b*****it. The thread titled " Who Will Replace Jen Brien" is another example of nonsense. There are posts in both of these threads that are very close to the legal definition of slander or libel but because posted about a public figure there is no consequence. And the posts made by the deluded one that seems to think that he is the arbiter of all things Radio are the emptiest of all.
I suggest that before you try to put words in my mouth you get your facts straight. I hope I have clarified my position to you. If you don't like her write a letter to Peter Casey instead of of posting the same stuff over and over. These two Brien threads bring to mind the expression about "flogging a dead horse."

It's interesting that the original post from Vinnie was directed to me but now that I've responded my name is removed.....don't quite know how that works but my response still goes
 
Vinnie, you nailed it.

buick, I will no longer respond to your posts becasue a person cannot have a sensible conversation with an idiot as they will beat you with experience - and I am being beat here...lol

You simply want to incite an argument among those who do not agree with you, not have a meaningful conversation.

BTW, it would appear in your way of thinking that there is a fine line between slander and the first amendment. If we are to go by that measure, I suppose one could say Ms. Brien crosses that line every night with her constant bad mouthing of her neighbors, calling them names, bad mouthing her own family, previous co-workers, etc.
 
Vinnie, you nailed it.

buick, I will no longer respond to your posts becasue a person cannot have a sensible conversation with an idiot as they will beat you with experience - and I am being beat here...lol
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Katzie Boy
Thank God. You never replied with any intention of having a sensible or meaningful conversation. If we are going to engage in name callng let me say that you are the biggest ****** I've ever encountered. You spend too much time pontificating to have any kind of a conversation. At one time you said you were too tired to respond to one of my posts. It probably had too many words you didn't understand. I've been called an idiot or worse by people with more to offer than you and you know what? it hasn't changed my life any. You're almost a good enough clown to make a circus....but not quite. It seems you're lacking there also.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You simply want to incite an argument among those who do not agree with you, not have a meaningful conversation.

There are very few substantive posts in either Brien thread. A few, but certainly none of yours make the grade.

BTW, it would appear in your way of thinking that there is a fine line between slander and the first amendment. If we are to go by that measure, I suppose one could say Ms. Brien crosses that line every night with her constant bad mouthing of her neighbors, calling them names, bad mouthing her own family, previous co-workers, etc.

You really need to read up on the First Ammendment because you obviously dont have any real understanding of what it is.
Remember now, you said you're not going to respond to me anymore amd it's not nice to break a promise. So a s they say in the old country KMA.
 
Vinnie, you nailed it.

buick, I will no longer respond to your posts becasue a person cannot have a sensible conversation with an idiot as they will beat you with experience - and I am being beat here...lol

You simply want to incite an argument among those who do not agree with you, not have a meaningful conversation.

BTW, it would appear in your way of thinking that there is a fine line between slander and the first amendment. If we are to go by that measure, I suppose one could say Ms. Brien crosses that line every night with her constant bad mouthing of her neighbors, calling them names, bad mouthing her own family, previous co-workers, etc.

For some reason that didn't post as I thought it would so here it is again just to make it easy on you

katzie boy
Thank God. You never replied with any intention of having a sensible or meaningful conversation. If we are going to engage in name callng let me say that you are the biggest ****** I've ever encountered. You spend too much time pontificating to have any kind of a conversation. At one time you said you were too tired to respond to one of my posts. It probably had too many words you didn't understand. I've been called an idiot or worse by people with more to offer than you and you know what? it hasn't changed my life any. You're almost a good enough clown to make a circus....but not quite. It seems you're lacking there also.
There are very few substantive posts in either Brien thread. A few, but certainly none of yours make the grade.
You really need to read up on the First Ammendment because you obviously dont have any real understanding of what it is.
Remember now, you said you're not going to respond to me anymore amd it's not nice to break a promise. So a s they say in the old country KMA.
 
It's interesting that the original post from Vinnie was directed to me but now that I've responded my name is removed.....don't quite know how that works but my response still goes

Buick -- I removed your name, because I had confused you with someone else who has been a big Brien supporter. I removed it a few minutes after I made the original post. Sorry.

By the way, do you think my latest post on Ms. Brien is substantive enough? There is nothing made up in it. And yes, she still stinks and gets worse by the show.
 
Last edited:
Buick -- I removed your name, because I had confused you with someone else who has been a big Brien supporter. I removed it a few minutes after I made the original post. Sorry.

By the way, do you think my latest post on Ms. Brien is substantive enough? There is nothing made up in it. And yes, she still stinks and gets worse by the show.
Vinnie,
Thank you for the explanation. Substantive or not it's immaterial to me. I've said I don't listen very often. I don't really care one way or the other about her or her show. If I tune in and I don't like what I hear I just shut it off. Life is way to short to get all wound up over the kind of crap these threads generate. My problem is with the way these two threads are used.
 
I guess I am wound up because WBZ and Jen Brien are destroying a wonderful legacy built many years ago by Larry Glick. It is a shame what they have done to the overnight show.
 
I guess I am wound up because WBZ and Jen Brien are destroying a wonderful legacy built many years ago by Larry Glick. It is a shame what they have done to the overnight show.

Hey Vinnie,
My opinion is that the WBZ legacy changed years ago.....and has gotten to be less and less as they start to behave like all the stations out there, informertials eetc. Even the Clear Channel part of it doesn't mean what it once did. The're just like everyone else, just trying to make a profit. Radio isn't what it used to be and a lot of the problem was created by radio itself....cross...multi station ownership and a generally shrinking market. There's just too much competition and way too many sources with the Internet etc.I don't think you'll ever see a Glick or Raleigh or Nathan again, they had something unique and Management allowed them to run with it.
You can debate as to whether Brien has any talent or not but she has been around at smaller stations for quite a while before the ill fated gig at WRKO. I realy don't know what the Management at WBZ has told her they expect. To my ear it sounds like she hasn't been able to figure it out yet and gets sidetracked too easily. I don't listen enough to comment beyond that. There's a philosophy in radio that says you should tailor your presentation as if you were talking to one person and avoid using phrases that imply more than a single listener. It's supposed to make the listener feel like they are being spoken to on a one to one basis. I think she wanders too far and as to whether or not she realizes it I don't know.
There really isn't anyone on WBZ talk that's anything special anymore since Norm Narthan. I think Nathan was a genius.(IMHO) I think they're all prety generic and unfortunately thats what radio in general has become - generic pablum. Because of Consultants everyone tries to stay the same as everyone else that's doing that particular format. Also, the talent pool is not what it used to be. Part of the reason being that there is no place to develop it anymore.
Good to exchange ideas with you. Have a good day.
As an aside I would appreciate if katzradio doesn't chime in on this beause it seems his idea of a conversation is to see how many verbal hand grenades he can throw per post...and besides he promised he wouldn't respond to my posts because I'm an idiot.
 
I guess I am wound up because WBZ and Jen Brien are destroying a wonderful legacy built many years ago by Larry Glick. It is a shame what they have done to the overnight show.

Vinnie,

Larry was the best, no question. I enjoyed the tinmes he made return appearance with Steve as well. But for me, it's a bit different than that. Yes, she is quite certainly destroying that legacy and that is a shame, but then again - that happens in markets everyday across the country. For me, I personally liked the interaction I had with previous hosts and simply being able to listen the whole night through without having the urge to upchuck.

So that's it; After 11:59 pm, there's nothing to listen to and I along with many others miss that live/local radio show. Steve may or may not care about the legacy, I wouldn't really know. He did enjoy a long good run with 'BZ, except for that little hiccup a couple of years ago.

The "shut it off" answer is too easy; why should we have to do that? If there is such a large outcry concerning this host, as was the case with Grayson a few yrs. ago, then management should take action.
 
Hey Vinnie,
My opinion is that the WBZ legacy changed years ago.....and has gotten to be less and less as they start to behave like all the stations out there, informertials eetc. Even the Clear Channel part of it doesn't mean what it once did. The're just like everyone else, just trying to make a profit. Radio isn't what it used to be and a lot of the problem was created by radio itself....cross...multi station ownership and a generally shrinking market. There's just too much competition and way too many sources with the Internet etc.I don't think you'll ever see a Glick or Raleigh or Nathan again, they had something unique and Management allowed them to run with it.
You can debate as to whether Brien has any talent or not but she has been around at smaller stations for quite a while before the ill fated gig at WRKO. I realy don't know what the Management at WBZ has told her they expect. To my ear it sounds like she hasn't been able to figure it out yet and gets sidetracked too easily. I don't listen enough to comment beyond that. There's a philosophy in radio that says you should tailor your presentation as if you were talking to one person and avoid using phrases that imply more than a single listener. It's supposed to make the listener feel like they are being spoken to on a one to one basis. I think she wanders too far and as to whether or not she realizes it I don't know.
There really isn't anyone on WBZ talk that's anything special anymore since Norm Narthan. I think Nathan was a genius.(IMHO) I think they're all prety generic and unfortunately thats what radio in general has become - generic pablum. Because of Consultants everyone tries to stay the same as everyone else that's doing that particular format. Also, the talent pool is not what it used to be. Part of the reason being that there is no place to develop it anymore.
Good to exchange ideas with you. Have a good day.
As an aside I would appreciate if katzradio doesn't chime in on this beause it seems his idea of a conversation is to see how many verbal hand grenades he can throw per post...and besides he promised he wouldn't respond to my posts because I'm an idiot.

For my money, Norm Nathan was the best, with Commander Glick not too far behind. It was a rare show by either of those guys that I was not laughing very hard. In fact, there was many a night with the earphone in that I woke my wife out of a sound sleep because I laughed out loud while in bed. Man, do I miss Norm.
 
For my money, Norm Nathan was the best, with Commander Glick not too far behind. It was a rare show by either of those guys that I was not laughing very hard. In fact, there was many a night with the earphone in that I woke my wife out of a sound sleep because I laughed out loud while in bed. Man, do I miss Norm.

Norm was something very special all he had to do was open his mouth and I was on the floor laughing. It was a sad day when he died.
 
For my money, Norm Nathan was the best, with Commander Glick not too far behind. It was a rare show by either of those guys that I was not laughing very hard. In fact, there was many a night with the earphone in that I woke my wife out of a sound sleep because I laughed out loud while in bed. Man, do I miss Norm.

I wish there were more clips of Norm out there. Unfortunately, we only have that one CD that Jordan produced years ago.
 
btw WBZ runs news about 5 am-8 pm and then talk. Their slogan is "News Radio". Similarly WHJJ 920 in Prov (Clear Channel) is now also calling itself "News Radio"--I think it has a news block in AMD with Ron St Pierre, then talk from Beck, Rush, Hannity etc. Talk shows but again a "News Radio" slogan (Talk ABOUT the news? Or accenting their use of local/national news...)

http://www.whjjam.com
"Providence's News, Traffic, and Weather"
 
Last edited:
For my money, Norm Nathan was the best, with Commander Glick not too far behind. It was a rare show by either of those guys that I was not laughing very hard. In fact, there was many a night with the earphone in that I woke my wife out of a sound sleep because I laughed out loud while in bed. Man, do I miss Norm.

The Ol' Sport was always " plush but never ostentatious".... ;-)
 
There was a cass. put out some years ago (by Jordan Rich for charity) of the best of Norm Nathan; I found a copy in the swap shop at the Osterville town dump when I was helping my dad get rid of trash some years back...
 
There was a cass. put out some years ago (by Jordan Rich for charity) of the best of Norm Nathan; I found a copy in the swap shop at the Osterville town dump when I was helping my dad get rid of trash some years back...

Are you talking about "Sounds in the Night" or is there another recording? Jordan released "Sounds in the Night" on CD a few years ago.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom