• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

June Ratings/Demos

In the "key" demos on past "Research Director" Round Ups posted here, they've mentioned KTU at #6, 7, or #8 in some of those demos when they're not in the Top 5, and that likely means they fare slightly better with their target of women in those demos. If they're consistently Top 10, 18-49 or 25-54, which puts them in the top tier of local stations, combined with being an almost 30 year old market brand, they should continue being a big biller for the foreseeable future.
Thank you
 
OK got it. 465K cume in NYC still sucks regardless of those statistical acrobatics.
Theater...what are ya smokin? (send our way) - I think that is respectable as hell, especially since you have to remember the demo is nothing under 50. I also would suggest of all of the stations in NYC, this station would have an additional 10% listenership that could never be contacted to be rated. On AM in 2025. Hey David, what were the numbers like over the decades for this station?
 
They should have put Alt on 94.7 and The Block on 92.3. What other format could they try on 94.7 AAA? CHR? Adult Hits?
I think we may actually have had a record amount of days since someone suggested Alt as a format that needs to come back to NY. When and where has this format been extremely successful in the last half decade?

Crap, now I am sounding like BigA and David. Must be my apparent sudden love for Cats.
 
For an AM talker with no central zone FM, it does not "suck". It's comparable to the cume of KFI, in fact. Does KFI "suck" as well?
According to BIA Kelsey, KFI is one of the best billing AM-only stations in the country. Last time I saw the stats, its billing was similar to other iHeart stations in Los Angeles. The list used to have WCBS at the top. It includes KOA Denver, WLW Cincinnati and KTRH Houston. Meanwhile, I never see WABC on any of those lists of top billing AM-only stations.
 
As you can see, KFI has 100K more cume than WABC in a market that has 5 million fewer people.
And KFI has been a talk "powerhouse" for about 40 years. Mr. Cats' WABC "rebirth" is just a few years old. And WABC has another full 50 kw talk competitor in WOR, while KFI has nothing... unless you consider "get a clearance " KABC with its very limited signal in English speaking areas to be a competitor.
 
I can't think of any other formats they could try. At this point, Audacy might be better off selling the station.
There are a couple of options in Spanish, with Regional Mexican likely to be viable now. Another is a non-rhythmic (no reggaetón) pop and ballad based AC.
 
There are a couple of options in Spanish, with Regional Mexican likely to be viable now. Another is a non-rhythmic (no reggaetón) pop and ballad based AC.
I would move WINS to 94.7 then. Why not compete with 93.1 and 96.3 and 97.9? If you keep 94.7 as a rhythmic format or a format catering to Spanish language listeners you are in the same boat and ratings on 94.7 abysmal. Swap signals.
 
I would move WINS to 94.7 then. Why not compete with 93.1 and 96.3 and 97.9? If you keep 94.7 as a rhythmic format or a format catering to Spanish language listeners you are in the same boat and ratings on 94.7 abysmal. Swap signals.
Unless a station swaps frequencies for coverage reasons, changing frequency does nothing but confuse existing listeners and cause them to cease listening.
 
I'm of the opinion 94.7's #'s are more "signal" driven than they are format driven (Has ANY format performed well in the local history of that frequency?)
As far as I can tell, it's owner has not marketed it much. Is that due to financial constraints or recognition of the constraints of it's antenna?
With that in mind, what would be the purpose of moving WINS there? They're currently #2 in the useless 6+ numbers, but David says they're strong 45-54, which probably makes them more competitive 25-54 then WABC or WOR. I have to think that's coming from the powerful 92.3, not 1010, although the no way to really tell.
I would move WINS to 94.7 then. Why not compete with 93.1 and 96.3 and 97.9? If you keep 94.7 as a rhythmic format or a format catering to Spanish language listeners you are in the same boat and ratings on 94.7 abysmal. Swap signals.
 
I'm of the opinion 94.7's #'s are more "signal" driven than they are format driven (Has ANY format performed well in the local history of that frequency?)
As far as I can tell, it's owner has not marketed it much. Is that due to financial constraints or recognition of the constraints of it's antenna?
With that in mind, what would be the purpose of moving WINS there? They're currently #2 in the useless 6+ numbers, but David says they're strong 45-54, which probably makes them more competitive 25-54 then WABC or WOR. I have to think that's coming from the powerful 92.3, not 1010, although the no way to really tell.
Because 94.7 is a station that comes in well in more rural areas I like Sussex County.
 
Because 94.7 is a station that comes in well in more rural areas I like Sussex County.
David would know more about this, but I don't think it would be logical for WINS to abandon their strong overall signal at 92.3 to move to 94.7 simply because of Sussex County strength. Sussex is a small County in NW Jersey that's simply embedded in the NY Metro. There are probably minuscule sales dollars there that affect their overall bottom line.
 
Because 94.7 is a station that comes in well in more rural areas I like Sussex County.

94.7 should have remained a NJ focused station then. It could have been Northern New Jersey's equivalent of something like WKXW, providing news and information for a population of 4 million that doesn't have is own media outlet. By my estimate that would make North Jersey a Top-15 market with a population that's about 60 percent higher than Nassau-Suffolk. However, Nielsen doesn't even define North Jersey as its own market and Audacy would rather operate 94.7 as a last-place station in "New York" than a leading station in New Jersey where it's signal covers best.
 
Audacy should work out a deal with Emmis to swap 94.7 with 98.7 (with some cash involved obviously). I think The Block would work better there. Of course La Exitosa won’t do well at 94.7, but Emmis isn’t interested in a long term presence here.
 


Back
Top Bottom