S
Scott_Petibone
Guest
I've been a little busy lately, could someone please update me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Check 1, Check 2
> I've been a little busy lately, could someone please update
> me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
I'm not sure. Is K-Rock beating them yet? Is LunchPail beating Beaner & Wiener?
Please. Enlighten us.
> I've been a little busy lately, could someone please update
> me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
I'm not sure. Is K-Rock beating them yet? Is LunchPail beating Beaner & Wiener?
Please. Enlighten us.
S
Scott_Petibone
Guest
Actually
> > I've been a little busy lately, could someone please
> update
> > me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
>
> I'm not sure. Is K-Rock beating them yet? Is LunchPail
> beating Beaner & Wiener?
> Please. Enlighten us.
>
Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
> > I've been a little busy lately, could someone please
> update
> > me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
>
> I'm not sure. Is K-Rock beating them yet? Is LunchPail
> beating Beaner & Wiener?
> Please. Enlighten us.
>
Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
Re: Actually
> Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
Hmmm. How much of the Spring book did Beaner & Ken actually participate in? Oh, well. It doesn't matter. Let's see if they're still around when the summer book comes out.
> Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
Hmmm. How much of the Spring book did Beaner & Ken actually participate in? Oh, well. It doesn't matter. Let's see if they're still around when the summer book comes out.
S
Scott_Petibone
Guest
Re: Actually
> > Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
>
> Hmmm. How much of the Spring book did Beaner & Ken actually
> participate in? Oh, well. It doesn't matter. Let's see if
> they're still around when the summer book comes out.
>
They participated in all of it. I agree.
> > Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
>
> Hmmm. How much of the Spring book did Beaner & Ken actually
> participate in? Oh, well. It doesn't matter. Let's see if
> they're still around when the summer book comes out.
>
They participated in all of it. I agree.
M
Mr_Stone
Guest
> I've been a little busy lately, could someone please update
> me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
The big comeback has begun,
and when it's all said and done,
the 'dog will have died,
krock will be fried,
and the X will again be the one.
>
> me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
The big comeback has begun,
and when it's all said and done,
the 'dog will have died,
krock will be fried,
and the X will again be the one.
>
F
faridwontmind
Guest
> > I've been a little busy lately, could someone please
> update
> > me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
>
> The big comeback has begun,
> and when it's all said and done,
> the 'dog will have died,
> krock will be fried,
> and the X will again be the one.
> >
>
They don't allow you to see trends there,do they?
Signed,
JACK
> update
> > me on that big X comeback. How's that been goin?
>
> The big comeback has begun,
> and when it's all said and done,
> the 'dog will have died,
> krock will be fried,
> and the X will again be the one.
> >
>
They don't allow you to see trends there,do they?
Signed,
JACK
K
Kemosabe
Guest
Re: Actually
> > > Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
Only in the narrow young demo that KRock targets. (53 percent of their cume is 12-24 so maybe that's his demo!)
But 18-49 Adults and 18-49 Men, 95X is way ahead of KRock. For example, 95X is # 3 Men 18-49 in mornings. KRock is # 6.
95X is # 5 Adults 18-49 in mornings and KRock is # 9.
And 25-54 Adults and Men 95X way ahead of KRock. # 5 Men vs. # 9 for KRock.
Wasn't it Donut Boy who once accused me of using a narrow demo?
Beaner & Ken even beat Garbagepail 12+.
"Kettle, this is Pot...you're black."
> > > Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the Spring.
Only in the narrow young demo that KRock targets. (53 percent of their cume is 12-24 so maybe that's his demo!)
But 18-49 Adults and 18-49 Men, 95X is way ahead of KRock. For example, 95X is # 3 Men 18-49 in mornings. KRock is # 6.
95X is # 5 Adults 18-49 in mornings and KRock is # 9.
And 25-54 Adults and Men 95X way ahead of KRock. # 5 Men vs. # 9 for KRock.
Wasn't it Donut Boy who once accused me of using a narrow demo?
Beaner & Ken even beat Garbagepail 12+.
"Kettle, this is Pot...you're black."
F
faridwontmind
Guest
Re: Actually Krock KILLED 95X in July
> > > > Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the
> Spring.
>
>
> Only in the narrow young demo that KRock targets. (53
> percent of their cume is 12-24 so maybe that's his demo!)
>
> But 18-49 Adults and 18-49 Men, 95X is way ahead of KRock.
> For example, 95X is # 3 Men 18-49 in mornings. KRock is #
> 6.
>
> 95X is # 5 Adults 18-49 in mornings and KRock is # 9.
>
> And 25-54 Adults and Men 95X way ahead of KRock. # 5 Men
> vs. # 9 for KRock.
>
> Wasn't it Donut Boy who once accused me of using a narrow
> demo?
>
> Beaner & Ken even beat Garbagepail 12+.
>
> "Kettle, this is Pot...you're black."
>
Ahhhhhmmmmmmmm.We will assume you did not see last weeks trend.
"How goes the 95X comeback?"Slow,VERY slow"
> > > > Actually, Lunchpail did beat Beaner & Ken in the
> Spring.
>
>
> Only in the narrow young demo that KRock targets. (53
> percent of their cume is 12-24 so maybe that's his demo!)
>
> But 18-49 Adults and 18-49 Men, 95X is way ahead of KRock.
> For example, 95X is # 3 Men 18-49 in mornings. KRock is #
> 6.
>
> 95X is # 5 Adults 18-49 in mornings and KRock is # 9.
>
> And 25-54 Adults and Men 95X way ahead of KRock. # 5 Men
> vs. # 9 for KRock.
>
> Wasn't it Donut Boy who once accused me of using a narrow
> demo?
>
> Beaner & Ken even beat Garbagepail 12+.
>
> "Kettle, this is Pot...you're black."
>
Ahhhhhmmmmmmmm.We will assume you did not see last weeks trend.
"How goes the 95X comeback?"Slow,VERY slow"
K
Kemosabe
Guest
Caught distorting Spring book, Galaxy resorts to EXTRAPS!
> Ahhhhhmmmmmmmm.We will assume you did not see last weeks
> trend.
Wait...the poster initially claimed KRock beat 95X in Spring. When I showed that the only definition of "beating 95X" was in a very narrow young demo, the poster changes subject to the July "trend."
But poster is not even talking trend...in the trend (rolling averages) 95X beats KRock in all the same demos as in the Spring book. His sliver of hope hinges on a raw extrapolated month.
Oh, how very very sad. Now Ed's definition of success is based on one unweighted extrap. This is a guy who is on the Arbitron Advisory Board and should know better.
> Ahhhhhmmmmmmmm.We will assume you did not see last weeks
> trend.
Wait...the poster initially claimed KRock beat 95X in Spring. When I showed that the only definition of "beating 95X" was in a very narrow young demo, the poster changes subject to the July "trend."
But poster is not even talking trend...in the trend (rolling averages) 95X beats KRock in all the same demos as in the Spring book. His sliver of hope hinges on a raw extrapolated month.
Oh, how very very sad. Now Ed's definition of success is based on one unweighted extrap. This is a guy who is on the Arbitron Advisory Board and should know better.
S
Scott_Petibone
Guest
Don't you have VP stuff to do?
No. He beat them in a major demo. Strait up beat them. I remember when you had Stern. It was awesome for you because you could just speak in major demos, now, you sound pathetic with your disecting of the numbers. Did K-Rock get beat in the 44-48 male demo? yes. But not by you. Jeesh. For a guy that has "VP" attached to his name, you're pretty pathetic. Don't you have "VP" stuff to do?
and what's with the racist talk? kettle? black? Damn, manager's are supposed to know better.
No. He beat them in a major demo. Strait up beat them. I remember when you had Stern. It was awesome for you because you could just speak in major demos, now, you sound pathetic with your disecting of the numbers. Did K-Rock get beat in the 44-48 male demo? yes. But not by you. Jeesh. For a guy that has "VP" attached to his name, you're pretty pathetic. Don't you have "VP" stuff to do?
and what's with the racist talk? kettle? black? Damn, manager's are supposed to know better.
F
faridwontmind
Guest
Re: 95X RIP
> > Ahhhhhmmmmmmmm.We will assume you did not see last weeks
> > trend.
>
> Wait...the poster initially claimed KRock beat 95X in
> Spring. When I showed that the only definition of "beating
> 95X" was in a very narrow young demo, the poster changes
> subject to the July "trend."
>
> But poster is not even talking trend...in the trend (rolling
> averages) 95X beats KRock in all the same demos as in the
> Spring book. His sliver of hope hinges on a raw extrapolated
> month.
>
>
> Oh, how very very sad. Now Ed's definition of success is
> based on one unweighted extrap. This is a guy who is on the
> Arbitron Advisory Board and should know better.
>
Take your pick.Do we discuss the terrible beating that TK gave you in the Spring or the a-- beating that Krock gave you in last weeks trend?
Signed,
JACK
> > Ahhhhhmmmmmmmm.We will assume you did not see last weeks
> > trend.
>
> Wait...the poster initially claimed KRock beat 95X in
> Spring. When I showed that the only definition of "beating
> 95X" was in a very narrow young demo, the poster changes
> subject to the July "trend."
>
> But poster is not even talking trend...in the trend (rolling
> averages) 95X beats KRock in all the same demos as in the
> Spring book. His sliver of hope hinges on a raw extrapolated
> month.
>
>
> Oh, how very very sad. Now Ed's definition of success is
> based on one unweighted extrap. This is a guy who is on the
> Arbitron Advisory Board and should know better.
>
Take your pick.Do we discuss the terrible beating that TK gave you in the Spring or the a-- beating that Krock gave you in last weeks trend?
Signed,
JACK
Trend? You're basing your attack on a TREND?
> Take your pick.Do we discuss the terrible beating that TK
> gave you in the Spring or the a-- beating that Krock gave
> you in last weeks trend?
> Signed,
> JACK
K-Rock won ONE TREND, and you're excited? What did they give away, Ed's Jag?
Pathetic.
> Take your pick.Do we discuss the terrible beating that TK
> gave you in the Spring or the a-- beating that Krock gave
> you in last weeks trend?
> Signed,
> JACK
K-Rock won ONE TREND, and you're excited? What did they give away, Ed's Jag?
Pathetic.
Stirring The Pot
>
> and what's with the racist talk? kettle? black? Damn,
> manager's are supposed to know better.
>
Axiom: "That's the pot calling the kettle black."
Origin, 1700's, England. Both pots and kettles, used for cooking and having endured open fire, became blackened by the flames.
Bone, you get the benefit of the doubt, presuming you're just stirring the pot.
Your end-post was mildly humorous. But just in case...
<hr>
We now return to the blood sport that makes this board so entertaining.
>
> and what's with the racist talk? kettle? black? Damn,
> manager's are supposed to know better.
>
Axiom: "That's the pot calling the kettle black."
Origin, 1700's, England. Both pots and kettles, used for cooking and having endured open fire, became blackened by the flames.
Bone, you get the benefit of the doubt, presuming you're just stirring the pot.
Your end-post was mildly humorous. But just in case...
<hr>
We now return to the blood sport that makes this board so entertaining.
E
evilinsider
Guest
oh bone
Bone you're funny ! You criticize him for dissecting numbers ?!! What a hoot !
You are the King of Extraps ! Dont you just hate it when people turn (BLEEP) around on ya like that. Dont you just hate it when someone calls you out ?
Man, that must suck.
Bone you're funny ! You criticize him for dissecting numbers ?!! What a hoot !
You are the King of Extraps ! Dont you just hate it when people turn (BLEEP) around on ya like that. Dont you just hate it when someone calls you out ?
Man, that must suck.
E
evilinsider
Guest
1/2 of one 6 of the other
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
What is this fight about ? It certainly isnt a fight over Who's Number One !
No one cares who comes in 9th! This is a fight between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb- one could kill the other...it still wont matter. Neither is a contender. Boooorrrrrriiiiiinnnnggggggg!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
What is this fight about ? It certainly isnt a fight over Who's Number One !
No one cares who comes in 9th! This is a fight between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb- one could kill the other...it still wont matter. Neither is a contender. Boooorrrrrriiiiiinnnnggggggg!
E
evilinsider
Guest
Re: Trend?
That's all the amo Bone has. So sad isnt it ? He has nothing in his arsenal, and resorts to throwing his last grenade. Kaboom- and now he's got nothin left. Pathetic, Big Bag o' wind.
That's all the amo Bone has. So sad isnt it ? He has nothing in his arsenal, and resorts to throwing his last grenade. Kaboom- and now he's got nothin left. Pathetic, Big Bag o' wind.
Re: Trend?
> That's all the amo Bone has. So sad isnt it ? He has
> nothing in his arsenal, and resorts to throwing his last
> grenade. Kaboom- and now he's got nothin left. Pathetic,
> Big Bag o' wind.
Sniff... Sniff... HEY! I'M NOT SURE THAT WAS A GRENADE!
> That's all the amo Bone has. So sad isnt it ? He has
> nothing in his arsenal, and resorts to throwing his last
> grenade. Kaboom- and now he's got nothin left. Pathetic,
> Big Bag o' wind.
Sniff... Sniff... HEY! I'M NOT SURE THAT WAS A GRENADE!
- Status
- This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.