Street Novelist
Banned
I think the Four Seasons would work well on a Classical station.![]()
Good job sir
I think the Four Seasons would work well on a Classical station.![]()
One of the bigger issues the management of a classical station has is that group of self-proclaimed "experts" who get mad when you use the Cleveland Symphony rendition rather than the New York version of a work. Or, heaven forbid, the St. Martin in the Fields version which is just a bit too sappy...
Cleveland under Szell was great. But he was only there until 1970, and good stereo classical recordings had not become prevalent enough for us to have a wealth of his material. Every time in season that I was in Cleveland, I attended.Cleveland wasn't bad. The Philadelphia under Ormandy was the worst. Duller than dull. But I always prefer Von Karajan.
We had a commercial Jazz station back in the '90s, simply called "Jazz FM". They had bad ratings, did some research, and found out people didn't sample the station because the name put them off, so it became just "J-FM". It didn't last long before reverting, because what you're doing is getting people to sample the station with a super generic three-letter name, finding out it plays jazz all day, and they don't like jazz, so off it goes. Meanwhile, the people who do like jazz haven't got a clue what "J-FM" stands for.That is not true. XHLNC did avoid the word classical on air calling it the world's biggest hits. So by your logic, if there was a classic rock station and you didn't call it classic rock on the air, it would fail because people would forget about it and because not calling it classic rock means nobody would be interested in listening..
The station had been set up by the Dad to be a classical station perpetually. It may have been a non-profit. In the end, there was lots of money missed by the frequency being classical versus a mass appeal station. When the station started, they were the only classical on the dial in areas of Southern California.
They might indeed get mad if you play the Cleveland Orchestra rendition of anything with the late, great George Szell at the helm because those recordings were considered definitive, almost too good and therefore "beyond criticism" - so some of those folks might say: "there must be something wrong with them that people are just somehow missing".One of the bigger issues the management of a classical station has is that group of self-proclaimed "experts" who get mad when you use the Cleveland Symphony rendition rather than the New York version of a work. Or, heaven forbid, the St. Martin in the Fields version which is just a bit too sappy...
We had a commercial Jazz station back in the '90s, simply called "Jazz FM". They had bad ratings, did some research, and found out people didn't sample the station because the name put them off, so it became just "J-FM". It didn't last long before reverting, because what you're doing is getting people to sample the station with a super generic three-letter name, finding out it plays jazz all day, and they don't like jazz, so off it goes. Meanwhile, the people who do like jazz haven't got a clue what "J-FM" stands for.
At some point during 570 KLAC's tenure as a Country station, the personalities were instructed to never refer to the station or the music as "Country". This apparently was the policy for a couple of years...what do you suppose the reasoning or lack thereof was??That is a perfect example of what not to do, and why station management is often clueless about the right way to brand a station to attract a desired audience.
What that station obviously did not understand is that "Jazz-FM" was a perfect, simple positioner which told potential listeners who liked that music what to expect. But the justification for changing that -- too little sampling -- missed the point completely; people who didn't like Jazz weren't going to sample the station anyway, and changing the name drove away more sampling by potential listeners who did like the music.
The same reasoning explains why my format running on my client station in Albuquerque is called The Eighties Channel™.
At some point during 570 KLAC's tenure as a Country station, the personalities were instructed to never refer to the station or the music as "Country". This apparently was the policy for a couple of years...what do you suppose the reasoning or lack thereof was??
At some point during 570 KLAC's tenure as a Country station, the personalities were instructed to never refer to the station or the music as "Country". This apparently was the policy for a couple of years...what do you suppose the reasoning or lack thereof was??

Seriously? My parents had three albums of Christmas music and he was on all three of them.The Philadelphia under Ormandy was the worst. Duller than dull. But I always prefer Von Karajan.
But is the jazz real jazz or smooth jazz?We had a commercial Jazz station back in the '90s, simply called "Jazz FM". They had bad ratings, did some research, and found out people didn't sample the station because the name put them off, so it became just "J-FM". It didn't last long before reverting, because what you're doing is getting people to sample the station with a super generic three-letter name, finding out it plays jazz all day, and they don't like jazz, so off it goes. Meanwhile, the people who do like jazz haven't got a clue what "J-FM" stands for.
Olivia's country years were the '70s. She went pure pop in '81 with "Physical." I used to listen to WHN during the years that Hartford/New Haven didn't have a country station. Nothing about its presentation seemed country at all, and most songs with even a hint of twang, fiddles and steel guitars never made the playlist. When Randy Travis, Dwight Yoakam and others came along in the late '80s, it was OK to sound country everywhere, even in the Northeast. Except NYC, where the demographics and lifestyle never worked for country.There was a point during the 80s when country music itself was trying to de-emphasize association with the word "country." That was when you saw the rise of Olivia Newton John and other pop crossover artists. One of the most successful country radio stations at that time was WHN New York.
They didn't even use the word 'jazz' on air. Old airchecks have the jocks using the strap "Real Music Radio, J-FM".That is a perfect example of what not to do, and why station management is often clueless about the right way to brand a station to attract a desired audience.
What that station obviously did not understand is that "Jazz-FM" was a perfect, simple positioner which told potential listeners who liked that music what to expect. But the justification for changing that -- too little sampling -- missed the point completely; people who didn't like Jazz weren't going to sample the station anyway, and changing the name drove away more sampling by potential listeners who did like the music.
The same reasoning explains why my format running on my client station in Albuquerque is called The Eighties Channel™.
That's what my dad used to say about the Boston Symphony Orchestra when I'd ask him why he didn't have any BSO records in his huge collection. He did have plenty of Philadelphia/Ormandy, though. As always, taste is purely personal.Cleveland wasn't bad. The Philadelphia under Ormandy was the worst. Duller than dull.
It was 30 years ago, but I recall a lot of smooth jazz and fusion at the time. "Birdland" by Weather Report was an ever-present. The station still exists (after a few sales and moves around the dial, it's now on DAB) and their current playlist is here:But is the jazz real jazz or smooth jazz?
But is the jazz real jazz or smooth jazz?
I think it does. If the claim is that people know what jazz is, do they mean real jazz or smooth jazz when they are describing what jazz means to them.For the point being discussed, it doesn't matter.