• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

K-Rock's New Website

I think the logo looks like too Industrial. lets face, the people listening to rock in new York are likely to have college degrees, i think something in a late 70's early eighties revival would resonate better with todays 25 year olds.
 
Honestly, Free-Fm had a better logo and imaging, it ws the format that was crap. I don't know why they changed the logo and imaging, now it very well may be that the imaging and logo are carp and the format is fine.
 
Brooklyndon said:
Honestly, Free-Fm had a better logo and imaging, it ws the format that was crap. I don't know why they changed the logo and imaging, now it very well may be that the imaging and logo are carp and the format is fine.
Click to expand...

Uh, Free FM didn't have much of a logo...it was just a font with a ketchup stain behind it. (Or was that blood?). What's worse, it de-emphasized the frequency by making it a small afterthought at the top of the logo--which was a dumb move, since the frequency is often your most important identifier, especially with a brand new radio station. Worst logo ever.

Personally, I miss the previous K-Rock logo with the huge K at the top (with or without the circle in the back).
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom