• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KATY PERRY - PEACOCK

I'd say no, but not because of the title (it can't get much more explicit on CHR than "S&M"), but I really can't see this song have a long shelf life. It's a weak song, overly repetitive, and having a questionable chorus doesn't help its chances either.
 
I was just reading an article about Katy Perry tying MJ's record for five #1s from the same album, and the article stated that the label hadn't decided if it would release a sixth single from the album yet.

If I had to venture a guess, I'm guessing they'll fall on the side of the greed and squeeze every last drop of blood from this turnip, and release a sixth single, though.
 
justpassingthough said:
If I had to venture a guess, I'm guessing they'll fall on the side of the greed and squeeze every last drop of blood from this turnip, and release a sixth single, though.
Click to expand...


Greed or not, doesn’t it make good business sense to do this? Why wouldn’t they?
 
The FCC would have a fit (and so would conservative groups of parents) - and it's almost impossible to censor this song, since the entire subject of the whole song is wanting to see a guy's peacock

Stations might be able to get away with it in the extreme most Northern states - but as a country, IMO no way it's gonna happen
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom