93-3TheSurge said:
Well, thank you, Captain Obvious!! The "office" is just an example of a kind of "workplace."
An office is a workplace, but not all workplaces are offices. Try to use the correct term... this is like the post saying radio stations sell "space." Inaccurate, or at least very imprecise.
You mean to tell me that people actually work overnight? And they work on weekends? No way. Next you'll tell me people work on holidays...
Were I to go by your post, I would think all work is in 10-3 and in an office. You can't change the argument you made in your favor.
I pulled that "a third" statement from one of your posts (check "What if..." reply #23). I don't see KLBJ's market being any different than KBPA's market.
KLBJ is better located, site wise. It puts a 64 dbu over the entire market. KBPA misses parts of Bastrop and Williamson counties. This gives an advantage to KLBJ, although the current population in the extreme parts of those counties is relatively small.
You can't have it both ways, Eduardo. You talk about how great KBPA is doing in arbitron and then you preach about a usable signal being so important.
I just said in the last post that KBPA does well due mostly to the audience in the other counties, as it does not rank first 25-54 in Williamson. In other words, if it had a better signal, it might also be #1 in Williamson County and would be even better overall in the market.
According to you, if KLBJ moved its tower 38 miles SSW of Austin, it would lose "usable signal" in Williamson County which is "a third of their market."
I said that a move so far south would cost KLBJ about a third of the market that now has a full 64 dbu signal. They would lose all of WIllaimson, which they now cover almost 100%, and parts of other counties, including Travis. They would pick up a piece of the SA market, but lose an important part of the Austin market.
Enter KBPA, a station whose tower is 23 miles SSW of Austin, and you are going to tell me they have a usable signal in WillCo? Are you saying that 15 miles makes that much of a difference?
For a C0, that is about a third of the usable coverage. Look at JD's very informative post about the coverage distances for all classes of stations... remebering that the listing is for a maximum facility of each class.
KBPA covers with a 64 dbu signal only a small semi-circular shaped part of WIlliamson... it is, at least, where much of the population lives, but another 15 miles move would take the 64 dbu farther south, missing all of Williamson and significant chunks of Travis. It would have very limited coverage of the SA market, and a huge loss in the home market.
Of course, as JD also showed via the example of the spacing of KXTN, the same sort of scenario applies to KBPA. Were they able, they would move north, not south.