http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2007/db0907/DA-07-3843A1.txt
"...$6,400...KEVT...for apparent willful and repeated violation...for failing to ensure the operational readiness of KEVT’s Emergency Alert System (“EAS”) equipment...On August 17, 2006, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau’s San Diego Office conducted an inspection at the main studio of KEVT located at 2919 E. Broadway, Suite 203, Tucson, Arizona, accompanied by the KEVT chief engineer... Although EAS equipment was installed, the agent found that it was not operating properly at the time of inspection. The San Diego agent found that...no RWTs had been received from the LP-2 since June of 2005. The EAS logs also indicated that numerous RWTs were not transmitted in November 27, 2006 and consummated January 5, 2007...No entries were made by the KEVT staff in the EAS log to identify the causes of these failures or what steps were taken to remedy them. On the date of inspection, the San Diego agent requested that the LP-1 and LP-2 both transmit RWTs. Neither RWT could be heard through the KEVT EAS equipment and there was no indication that the KEVT EAS equipment received either RWT. The KEVT EAS equipment did not produce any EAS printout to indicate the RWTs from the LP stations had been received. The chief engineer acknowledged to the San Diego agent that the KEVT EAS equipment may have been having technical problems...On August 29, 2006, the San Diego agent spoke with the KEVT chief engineer and the chief engineer advised that One Mart would be replacing the KEVT EAS equipment. The KEVT chief engineer indicated that he was in the process of obtaining cost estimates from various EAS vendors."
"...$6,400...KEVT...for apparent willful and repeated violation...for failing to ensure the operational readiness of KEVT’s Emergency Alert System (“EAS”) equipment...On August 17, 2006, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau’s San Diego Office conducted an inspection at the main studio of KEVT located at 2919 E. Broadway, Suite 203, Tucson, Arizona, accompanied by the KEVT chief engineer... Although EAS equipment was installed, the agent found that it was not operating properly at the time of inspection. The San Diego agent found that...no RWTs had been received from the LP-2 since June of 2005. The EAS logs also indicated that numerous RWTs were not transmitted in November 27, 2006 and consummated January 5, 2007...No entries were made by the KEVT staff in the EAS log to identify the causes of these failures or what steps were taken to remedy them. On the date of inspection, the San Diego agent requested that the LP-1 and LP-2 both transmit RWTs. Neither RWT could be heard through the KEVT EAS equipment and there was no indication that the KEVT EAS equipment received either RWT. The KEVT EAS equipment did not produce any EAS printout to indicate the RWTs from the LP stations had been received. The chief engineer acknowledged to the San Diego agent that the KEVT EAS equipment may have been having technical problems...On August 29, 2006, the San Diego agent spoke with the KEVT chief engineer and the chief engineer advised that One Mart would be replacing the KEVT EAS equipment. The KEVT chief engineer indicated that he was in the process of obtaining cost estimates from various EAS vendors."