First, a bit of history. KGOW does hold a construction permit for a 1,000-watt directional facility off Eldridge Parkway north of I-10 but it can't be approved until the Army Corps of Engineers completes a land use survey for the area. Since that might never happen 1560 applied for an alternate site north of Katy with considerably more power (19,000 watts). While that application was being considered KGOW applied for what amounted to an "emergency" authorization to construct a temporary 100-watt nighttime facility adjacent to Bellaire, which has been on the air for some time now.
Now the latest news: still another revision has been accepted by the FCC. This one calls for a reduction of the proposed nighttime power from 19,000 to 15,000 watts. The complete application can be found here: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws...xt=25&appn=101271467&formid=301&fac_num=17389 While approval by the FCC is still not assured the latest changes do clear a few hurdles:
1) The reduction in power is actually being proposed to reduce harmful interference to a station in Cuba. Why do U.S. stations have to worry about this, since Cuba obviously doesn't care where their skywave lands and who receives interference from their outlaw operations?
2) The Mexican government has agreed to cancel nighttime operation plans for two stations, both of which were specifically mentioned in prior KGOW applications. Interference problems with regard to all U.S. stations had been satisfied but the two in Mexico hadn't been until now.
3) Mexico is requesting that the azimuth of the array be shifted by one degree clockwise to further reduce nighttime interference. I'm not sure I really understand this one; I'll have to research it a little further.
My take on this is that reducing power from 19 to 15kW would barely be noticeable and shifting the direction of the pattern by just one degree would be insignificant locally. But the big news is I really think this time the application will be approved. We're not talking nighttime coverage that would equal KTRH or KILT here, but it would probably compare somewhat favorably with KBME. In any event it would be a giant leap from their present 100 watt "nightlite."
Now the latest news: still another revision has been accepted by the FCC. This one calls for a reduction of the proposed nighttime power from 19,000 to 15,000 watts. The complete application can be found here: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws...xt=25&appn=101271467&formid=301&fac_num=17389 While approval by the FCC is still not assured the latest changes do clear a few hurdles:
1) The reduction in power is actually being proposed to reduce harmful interference to a station in Cuba. Why do U.S. stations have to worry about this, since Cuba obviously doesn't care where their skywave lands and who receives interference from their outlaw operations?
2) The Mexican government has agreed to cancel nighttime operation plans for two stations, both of which were specifically mentioned in prior KGOW applications. Interference problems with regard to all U.S. stations had been satisfied but the two in Mexico hadn't been until now.
3) Mexico is requesting that the azimuth of the array be shifted by one degree clockwise to further reduce nighttime interference. I'm not sure I really understand this one; I'll have to research it a little further.
My take on this is that reducing power from 19 to 15kW would barely be noticeable and shifting the direction of the pattern by just one degree would be insignificant locally. But the big news is I really think this time the application will be approved. We're not talking nighttime coverage that would equal KTRH or KILT here, but it would probably compare somewhat favorably with KBME. In any event it would be a giant leap from their present 100 watt "nightlite."