To add a couple of things here, first, I've been involved with frequency change proposals in the past but I'm baffled by this one. I'm still wondering why, from what I can tell, KVIC didn't fight this idea. Like I said, on the surface it looks like they get nothing out of it but I believe there may be other issues here, possibly involving another station. Let's see what comes along with the frequency change from KVIC; their previous applications dealt with antenna issues that were specific to their current operation on 95.1.
Secondly, perhaps my statement about KHTZ getting a "full Class C" needs to be put into perspective. While it will give them excellent coverage of Matagorda County (Palacios, Bay City et al), their signal in Victoria will be unremarkable. They'll provide a good signal into El Campo and Wharton and a decent one in the Brazosport area as well. So effectively KHTZ is moving out of the Victoria area (which is seriously overloaded with stations) into an area that is already served by numerous stations that include locals from the Bay City area, Houston rim-shots or by Houston stations themselves. Yes, getting a Class C is good for bragging rights, I suppose, although the tower location is awful. It's right along the Gulf Coast but, of course, it has to be that far south because of spacing issues with the Missouri City sticks.
fredcantu said:
If this switch allows 94.9 to be a full class C, why didn't KVIC do this in the first place when Univision asked them to downgrade to allow the 95.1 move-in into San Antonio?
The short answer is they would have run into short-spacing with adjacent-channel KBSO from Corpus Christi. In fact, the new facility for KHTZ will be slightly short spaced with 94.7 but they're addressing that with "contour protection."