Sounds like Rosanne Rosanadanna to me...
Nope, Tomás. She was "it's always something".Sounds like Rosanne Rosanadanna to me...
You're right: RR said "thought i was gonna die!"Nope, Tomás. She was "it's always something".
Emily Litella would do an editorial reply in which she had misunderstood the subject and when corrected would say "Oh, that's different then ... never mind."
So Mike is correct.
Typo above, rewritten below:In a word, yes.
There is a requirement that the simulcast of the main signal be identified as a digital broadcast.airs the regular big hits on their HD1 feed and maybe an older format on HD2
These are the customary ways most stations handle it. But the current version of 73.1201 is so vague that it allows for a lot of other interpretations, too.Now, let me try to explain what the legalities are for station identification as the FCC requires it, using KIIS as an example.
- Analog broadcast only (pre-HD): "KIIS-FM Los Angeles" (noting that when the calls changed to accommodate the simulcast with 1150 back in 1975, the "-FM" suffix was appended and was never removed from the official calls)
- Analog with main channel digital simulcast (which, as far as I am aware, is required to be the first HD channel): "KIIS-FM & HD Los Angeles"
- Digital stream on the second HD channel: "KIIS-FM-HD2 Los Angeles" ... etc., etc., etc.
Slightly OT, but I have always found it interesting that on the television side, station identifications do not have to include the subchannel, and sometimes the subchannel is on a different station's signal than the primary channel of the PSIP. For example, here in Los Angeles KTTV 11.3 is actually on physical channel 13.8 and so the legal IDs say "KCOP-TV Los Angeles".These are the customary ways most stations handle it. But the current version of 73.1201 is so vague that it allows for a lot of other interpretations, too.