• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Kimmel returns Tuesday

Status
Not open for further replies.
The only answer to this controversy is "Congress Shall Make No Law". We're begging the Government to let us watch a TV show. That's the post.
 
although they'll have to wait until 5am the next day for the episode to hit Hulu

Given the huge number of cancellations by Hulu subscribers over this, that may not matter as much as it used to. Again, there's always ABC's site, which requires no subscription (or even a login) to access.
 
I finally decided to see if I could be a clearinghouse for my local Indivisible because one more "Sinclair owns ABC and YouTube" post I had to debunk. It's not their fault. They shouldn't need to know all the network and corporate names
 
they can't gerrymander counties or precincts

Excuse me, but which "they" are you talking about, please?

This thread is complicated enough without having to guess which of the multitude of players you are referring to.
 
Judging from the fact that when Big 5 affiliated stations preempt Prime Time programming for Local Sports it usually only 10 times a year, I would say probably about 10 times or 2 weeks.
mostly for NFL pre season and the local broadcasts of Thursday and Monday Night Games (only on ESPN nationally)
 
We're not.

ABC is going to air the show tonight. Two private businesses, Sinclair and Nexstar, say they won't air it for their viewers. Past a certain number of pre-emptions, they're in breach of their affiliation contracts.

That's the post.
Correct. This shouldn't have gone down this road in the first place. Absolutely, Kimmel, Colbert, etc rise and fall on their own merits.
 
then complain to your TV provider who pays the retrans fees

We pay it not the provider.

It's a trickle down effect, but Don is ultimately correct.

The stations demand negotiate their carriage with the service provider, which is usually in the form of a per-subscriber fee (although the network O&Os usually include mandated carriage of their other networks, which also often have a per-subscriber fee) and/or the carriage of the digital subchannels.

The service providers, logically enough, pass this through to the subscribers on the monthly bill.

So Don could complain, but the answer would be "this is what was negotiated for you to watch the channel in the first place". The service providers are the real hostages and the subscribers are the innocent bystanders who can do nothing about it.
 
Now the question is will Nexstar and Sinclair air it, or will Disney have to find other stations in those markets to air it instead.
More than anything else, it should be suicide for Sinclair/Nexstar.

I mean, seriously. They do know YouTube exists. Streaming? Don't they? HELLO??

This is the problem with corporate censorship in the 21st century. It's harder than it looks. Yes, they kept that filthy Kimmel off their precious affiliate's sanctified airwaves. They also kept viewers (95% with Internet access) off.

And with the unpredictablity of Nexstar/Sinclair of Whatever Offends Them Next on these Karen channels, ultimately advertisers. One corporation's filth is another's treasure. At the expense of the discarding conglomerate (as Disney board chairman M. Mouse acknowledged in an unverified statement on Monday.)

But more than anything else, nothing illustrates why broadcast network TV is obsolete more clearly than this.

What is wrong with Nexstar and Sinclair? Have they no clue of their precarious place in the modern video landscape they share?

This is 2025, not 1985.
 
they can't gerrymander counties or precincts
Gerrymandering is quite literally the re-arrangement of counties and precincts to change the makeup of a congressional district.

For example, Sacramento County, where I live. There are three Congressional Districts for Sacramento County.

I live in the 3rd Congressional District of California. Ten years ago I lived in the same house. I was in the 7th Congressional District.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom