• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Kimmel returns Tuesday

Status
Not open for further replies.
More than anything else, it should be suicide for Sinclair/Nexstar.

I mean, seriously. They do know YouTube exists. Streaming? Don't they? HELLO??

This is the problem with corporate censorship in the 21st century. It's harder than it looks. Yes, they kept that filthy Kimmel off their precious affiliate's sanctified airwaves. They also kept viewers (95% with Internet access) off.

And with the unpredictablity of Nexstar/Sinclair of Whatever Offends Them Next on these Karen channels, ultimately advertisers. One corporation's filth is another's treasure. At the expense of the discarding conglomerate (as Disney board chairman M. Mouse acknowledged in an unverified statement on Monday.)

But more than anything else, nothing illustrates why broadcast network TV is obsolete more clearly than this.

What is wrong with Nexstar and Sinclair? Have they no clue of their precarious place in the modern video landscape they share?

This is 2025, not 1985.
Nexstar is very much aware of streaming as they pretty much said in their statement for people to go watch it on Disney+ or Hulu instead. "In the meantime, we note that Jimmy Kimmel Live! will be available nationwide on multiple Disney-owned streaming products."
 
Nexstar is very much aware of streaming as they pretty much said in their statement for people to go watch it on Disney+ or Hulu instead. "In the meantime, we note that Jimmy Kimmel Live! will be available nationwide on multiple Disney-owned streaming products."

That's interesting. So they wouldn't mind if ABC makes the whole network available on streaming TV? That way they'd no longer have exclusivity of the sports packages on weekends? Maybe ABC should say the stations can't brand themselves with the ABC logo anymore. This could lead to these stations needing a lot of expensive programming quickly. Most stations fiercely guard their network affiliations. This group doesn't seem to care.
 
This part where Nexstar is pre-empting Jimmy Kimmel that’s all a ploy to push for the Nexstar/Tegna deal and a ploy to protect a network they own it’s the CW. In Sacramento if the merger deal between Nexstar and Tegna is approved then one of the local stations would have to kick out either ABC from Tegna owned KXTV or Kick out Fox from Nexstar owned KTXL and send one of these networks to Hearst KQCA Sacramento it’s because Nexstar has the final say who gets to be the CW affiliate. I don’t think for one second Nexstar really cares what happens to Jimmy Kimmel or the View in the same way Disney does.
 
I sure did not expect this, but then I did not expect the two largest groups of affiliates to say "no thanks".

I incorrectly predicted his permanent firing, mostly because the three post-late news network shows are losing money. I wonder if they are all thinking that they need a full schedule of network offerings all day to sustain the OTA business model.

Is the Kimmel show sustainable without the two larger groups and several smaller operators? For about 75 years, TV networks have had a sales model that is based on near total national coverage.
 
Is the Kimmel show sustainable without the two larger groups and several smaller operators? For about 75 years, TV networks have had a sales model that is based on near total national coverage.

The bigger question is: Can the networks operate profitably as streaming outlets without licensed affiliated stations?

Given the likelihood of some change in ownership caps, perhaps the traditional network/affiliate model is obsolete.

We know that viewership of broadcast TV is now under 25%. Is that a sustainable model?

 
The bigger question is: Can the networks operate profitably as streaming outlets without licensed affiliated stations?

Let's broaden this a bit. We know that WTBS and WGN operated as "superstations" for many years. Could ABC do that with WABC? Make deals with cable companies to put that station in markets where there are network holes. Also do geo-fenced streaming, where the stations would be available in those markets. Bypass broadcast TV completely.
 
Nextstar & Sinclair caused Kimmel to be suspended, ABC caved to pressure from the angry viewers who threating their bottom line lead to Kimmel to return, but the boycott still stands with the 2 broadcast companies that triggered this to begin with, for those in markets where Nexstar & Sinclair owns your local ABC Station, Jimmy Kimmel Live's YouTube channel & Hulu/Disney+ is the only way to watch the show.
 
Let's broaden this a bit. We know that WTBS and WGN operated as "superstations" for many years. Could ABC do that with WABC? Make deals with cable companies to put that station in markets where there are network holes. Also do geo-fenced streaming, where the stations would be available in those markets. Bypass broadcast TV completely.
I thought superstations were phased out.

It would be easier to just put the big 4 on cable direct and not have affiliates.
 
I just took a look at Kimmel's Youtube page and it has about 21 million subscribers. Views from recent clips ranged from 52 thousand to 4.4 million. Who gets the money generated from all those views? If it's ABC, maybe that's why they didn't cancel the show.
 
I just took a look at Kimmel's Youtube page and it has about 21 million subscribers. Views from recent clips ranged from 52 thousand to 4.4 million. Who gets the money generated from all those views? If it's ABC, maybe that's why they didn't cancel the show.
I think Kimmel has rights to his show. Not sure if ABC owns it outright.
 
Guys: As soon as Disney said "we're putting him back on", Nexstar and Sinclair lost their leverage. They made their play to take Kimmel off nationwide and curry favor with the administration. It worked for six days, only three of them broadcast days, as Kimmel doesn't have new shows on Fridays.

Now, Nexstar and Sinclair are bucking breach of their affiliation contracts. Disney's not going to pull the show again, so that's the only road.

Their best play is to get the show back on the air, shrug and tell the administration "we tried" and hope that gets their respective acquisition deals approved.

Disney will have to face the heat alone, and with this move, it's basically acknowledging that. If anybody's got the legal muscle for a fight with the feds, it's Disney.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom