• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Kimmel returns Tuesday

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, I would presume an exemption exists for local breaking news coverage. Even ABC O&O KABC-TV pre-empted the entire network schedule for more than one day at the height of the Palisades and Eaton fire coverage. But I doubt that Nexstar and Sinclair could arrange for something like a chlorine factory fire every weeknight in every community where they own the ABC affilate.
There is a difference from local breaking news and a nationwide blackout.
 


Here is Senator Adam Schiff of California responding to Chairman Carrs decision on the Kimmel Situation. Keep in mind when Adam Schiff was in the US House his district included areas where the headquarters of Disney is located.

Sen. Adam Schiff and eight other senators sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission chairman Brendan Carr on Wednesday, questioning the FCC’s authority to commit so-called “political retribution against media outlets,” TheWrap has learned.

The group of Democrats further suggested Carr and President Donald Trump have been conducting “the most blatant and coordinated attack on the free press in American history.”


“The chilling effects of your public comments are evident in ABC’s response. While Disney reversed course on Sept. 22, 2025, stating that ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live’ will return to air following ‘thoughtful conversations,’ the timing of your threats and the broader pattern of government intimidation make clear that broadcasters were operating under extraordinary duress,” the senators wrote.
 
A lot of content from those sites has you login with a cable or similar service like YouTube TV to access such content. It must already know your service you are using.

Perhaps, but I only have broadband service from Spectrum, and from what I understand from many previous discussions about such content "sharing" there is a first time "pop up" requiring login with the initial provider. I have no such login with Spectrum, so that's not the answer here. If the access was automatic based on the website "knowing", I could access content on Hulu and Disney+. And I cannot.
 
There is a difference from local breaking news and a nationwide blackout.

That is precisely what I meant. Pre-emptions for local breaking news is likely allowed in the affiliate contracts without it counting against the limits.
 
One more time (because I've said it twice and it keeps coming up):


Pre-emptions for things like sports commitments, breaking news, etc. are a separate category from what I call "because we feel like it" pre-emptions.

"Because we feel like it" pre-emptions are things like an infomercial, whatever the 2025 equivalent of the Billy Graham Revival is, a local non-news show and what these guys are doing now.

Those are the limited number of pre-empts specified in their affiliation contracts (we don't know what that number is, and it can vary, but it's not a lot) that, as soon as they exceed it, they're in breach of their contract.
 
Trump: “He has no ratings…”
Kimmel: “I do now!”

That's live, and as the headline notes, with only 77% of the country able to watch. It does not count Live+1, Live+3 and Live+7 day DVR replays (I haven't seen the show yet---my wife and I play them back the following evening), it does not count streaming, and it does not count ABC.com or YouTube replays.
 
Here's a map of where Kimmel was not broadcast last night (via "Brilliant Maps" and "Terrible Maps" on Facebook):

Kimmel.Non-Carried.Stations.jpg

(Apologies to those with visual impairments; this is a map of the US showing markets where the ABC affiliates are owned either by Sinclair or Nexstar. Notable cities with such affiliates include Seattle, Portland, Salt Lake City, Tulsa, Little Rock, New Orleans, St. Louis, Nashville, Birmingham, Richmond, Washington, Columbia Columbus, Burlington (VT), Hartford (CT) - also excluded were much of west Texas, far northern California, central Nebraska, a big chunk of Montana, areas of eastern Kansas including Topeka, much of Michigan outside Detroit, central Illinois, a substantial part of upstate New York, etc.)

Edit: Columbus, Ohio; not "Columbia". Usually the mistake is the other way around.
 
Last edited:
Here's a map of where Kimmel was not broadcast last night (via "Brilliant Maps" and "Terrible Maps" on Facebook):

View attachment 10472

(Apologies to those with visual impairments; this is a map of the US showing markets where the ABC affiliates are owned either by Sinclair or Nexstar. Notable cities with such affiliates include Seattle, Portland, Salt Lake City, Tulsa, Little Rock, New Orleans, St. Louis, Nashville, Birmingham, Richmond, Washington, Columbia, Burlington (VT), Hartford (CT) - also excluded were much of west Texas, far northern California, central Nebraska, a big chunk of Montana, much of Michigan outside Detroit, central Illinois, a substantial part of upstate New York, etc.)

Disney's legal department has a tube of lawsuits that will clear up those ugly red (and gray) blotches fast.
 
Disney's legal department has a tube of lawsuits that will clear up those ugly red (and gray) blotches fast.

If Sinclair has any sense, they will realize that they will lose any such lawsuit, for the reasons you previously outlined ... but they also need to understand that if they lose the ABC affiliation, they lose the network's loyal viewers and don't get to expose them to the partisan, one-sided views they espouse in their local news coverage. (It is a fairly well-documented fact that in markets where network affiliates are responsible for the bulk of the local news coverage, which stations' newscasts gets which viewers tends to depend on which network those households watch most outside of news.)

Think of it as a "forced" boycott where the viewers have to tune in a different station to watch the shows they want to. Every such choice of viewing is a virtual boycott of all other stations during those programs.

And there are no guarantees of them picking up another network affiliation if Disney signs a station in any of those markets that is presently an independent. In fact, the odds are largely against them doing so.
 

Chairman Carr is this time the target of a complaint and its related to how the FCC handled the Jimmy Kimmel situation.


A public interest watchdog group has filed a bar complaint against Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr over his criticism of the ABC broadcast network and its late night talk show “Jimmy Kimmel Live.”

On Wednesday, the Campaign for Accountability (CFA) submitted an 11-page complaint to the D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel asking for an investigation into whether Carr’s comments that ultimately influenced two broadcasters to pull Kimmel’s show from their ABC affiliates violated certain professional conduct rules for licensed attorneys.


The complaint stems from comments Carr made after Kimmel criticized conservative activist Charlie Kirk following his death earlier this month.

In an interview with a podcaster last week, Carr warned that Disney and its ABC stations risked regulatory consequences if they continued to air “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”
 

Attachments

  • 2025-09-24-Brendan-Carr-Bar-Complaint-CFA.pdf
    324.3 KB · Views: 0
Chairman Carr is this time the target of a complaint and its related to how the FCC handled the Jimmy Kimmel situation.

Unfortunately, even if that effort is successful, disbarment or any other legal remedy would not remove him as FCC chair.
 
That still makes it YOUR PERSONAL POLITCAL OPINION. Which RadioDiscussions is not the place for. There's millions of other places to discuss politics.
It's an opinion about something said on TV. This may be about politicians, but it is not about politics.

What Kimmel said was that the MAGA folks were trying to cover up that the shooter was one of them. A lie, broadcast on national TV. And a very good subject for discussion as, in fact, we have posters here who say that it's OK for a comedian to lie because it's not "in a newscast".
I'm a registered independent as well. Doesn't mean anything
Yes and no. If one is neither Red nor Blue because they share some of the ideals of each side, it is very meaningful. On the other hand, that is politics.
Just another theory right now that you believe but doesn't mean its factually correct or wrong. Which makes it a personal political opinion. Take it elsewhere...
This is not a theory. The shooter was not MAGA and Kimmel implied that he was.
David, you're the one constantly instagating these threads. People do not come here for your political opinions.
Yet for days there were dozens of opinions from the farther Blue side that were not censored, deleted or
As I've said to you privately many times they come here to discuss with you your vast knowledge of radio.
And part of that is an international awareness of news distortion, lies and exaggeration as well as the other side of censorship, imprisonment and even death for telling the truth.
 
Actually, I would presume an exemption exists for local breaking news coverage. Even ABC O&O KABC-TV pre-empted the entire network schedule for more than one day at the height of the Palisades and Eaton fire coverage. But I doubt that Nexstar and Sinclair could arrange for something like a chlorine factory fire every weeknight in every community where they own the ABC affilate.
We have to go back several decades or more to remember when All In the Family and N.Y.P.D. Blue were not carried by a number of stations that felt they were inappropriate for their markets. They did not lose their affiliate agreements.

Similarly, in the first decades of TV and before each market had at least 3 TV stations, stations often shared two or even three of the networks, meaning that a lot of shows did not run in those markets.
 
Could you maybe come back on as your sock puppet* "Desertaire" and tell it to us again? After, what?, fifty(?) times I might still be missing your point.
Wrong, and offensive.
(* I don't know how many others spotted that when "Desertaire" shows up to post, David goes into radio silence. When David returns, "Desertaire" goes AWOL.
Also, one need not be a genius to get the meaning of "Desertaire" to someone living near Palm Springs. But then it might be me who's hallucinating.)
Again, wrong and without substance. I had back surgery this week and am still recovering... but I should not have to tell you that.
 
As I've said to you privately many times they come here to discuss with you your vast knowledge of radio.

And part of that is an international awareness of news distortion, lies and exaggeration as well as the other side of censorship, imprisonment and even death for telling the truth.

I don't know how much weight my opinion carries with either of you at the moment, but here goes.

The knowledge of radio which David has, which goes back farther than any of us -- myself, Mike Hagerty, and BigA included -- is indeed very much needed. There are too many people here who have misconceptions about the business, or have been misinformed in the past, or otherwise have little to no factual knowledge. And when one of us can answer that question in a direct manner, we improve the overall knowledge of everyone here.

But when the answer comes with philosophical comments, regardless of whether or not they have some tangential relevance, it does nothing other than inflame the discussion, which then inevitably spirals out of control and then Lance has to close the thread.

And I would imagine that every time he has to do so, he waits uneasily for the next thread to go down that path.

David, you and I have known each other for many years. We also have not judged each other on our different political views, for which I am grateful. But your frequent diversions into answers that do not directly relate to the question asked is at best a distraction and at worst inflammatory.

Please, mi amigo, stop.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom