PS: History proves that competition has always kept quality high. Monopolies have always kept all things one sided, stale and restricted.
> Look... someone (however back-woods country the owners might
> be) has bought 'way' off into the FM talk thing here in
> Houston. As a business man positioned directly in downtown
> Houston, listening to radio 9 hrs a day, I like the young,
> the new, the underdog in any situation... and I've learned I
> like that even in radio. If I don't like it, I turn it...
> but I always turn back to hear what might be new. I
> admittedly am a station turner. I like news, talk, politics,
> issues of the day, local and syndicated chatter of all
> things that matter - local and nationally. KFNC offers that
> if you'll just listen for a while. Not to mention the added
> antics of ol' personalities and the comfortable feelings
> that familiar air-wave "friends" offer.
>
> I'm 41 yrs old and as bright as the next listening
> pedestrian. But forgive me in saying, AM radio blows! On
> average, it just bores me to tears. Outside of certain
> syndicated programming, AM has no personality. SO very
> robotic and mundane. Just plain & dry.
>
> I personally don't give a damn what anyone listens to,
> watches, smokes, or whatever. I only joined this group to
> add a cross-section of a genuine "radio fanatic", in
> contrast to watching TV. All stations are important in the
> big picture in most markets. If they become unimportant,
> listeners - via 'numbers' will ultimately make them go away.
>
>
> I appreciate all - that all of you do. You make my sleepy,
> repetitious job tolerable every single day while I listen.
>
> thank you all!
>
>
> > > Not sure what billing numbers you are looking at. The
> last
> >
> > > time I saw their numbers KFNC was less than $100,000 for
>
> > the
> > > month and KIOL was less than $300,000 for the month.
> That
> > > may be fine in Beaumont, but in Houston it way off.
> >
> > $300k a month? Jeez, I've worked at stations that are
> > barely in the Top 75 that bill better than that, and with
> a
> > hell of a lot cheaper airstaff too!
> >
>