Yeah. Text book Common Law trademark case. Follows essentially the same fact pattern as a famous case about a locally-owned greasy spoon in Mattoon, IL called "Burger King." See Hoots v. Burger King (7th Cir. 1968)
94.1 has no claim. They ain't the Wolf. And, more importantly, they weren't when the URL launched.
But, and here's the rub: I can see an aggressive attorney filing suit against 94.1 should they come on as the Wolf for -- yup -- infringement of Common Law Trademark. It's a big stretch (and there are some contra arguments I will omit, since it is way off topic), but, it could be fun. Probably a loser, but fun.
Attorneys. Can't trust a one of 'em.
DE