• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KJDX Upgrade and KOSO Downgrade Approved by the FCC

MRK...not being up on my FCC ease...

Does this mean CC is one step closer to coming on line (or more accurate on air) with this move in to Sac?

Also, any idea/educated guess as to an actual station broadcast launch date?

Thanks in advance for your knowledge.
 
Interloper said:
MRK...not being up on my FCC ease...

Does this mean CC is one step closer to coming on line (or more accurate on air) with this move in to Sac?

Also, any idea/educated guess as to an actual station broadcast launch date?

Thanks in advance for your knowledge.


What this means, is that CC may begin constructing new facilities for these stations. The new 93.1 in Sacramento cannot sign-on or even conduct tests until KOSO is moved to its new facility.

The Pollock Pines/ Sacramento facility will be easy because they are moving to an existing tower (KCCL0 with 20.5 kw.

I know know if there is an existing tower for the new KOSO facility. If there isn't, then one would have to be built and that may take some time.

To answer your question about a sign-on date, it could be soon to several months based on the above criteria.

Format? Your guess is as good as mine.
 
Newsperson responds:

Michael is that the tower just south of Placerville on Highway 49?

If so does that really place a line of sight signal over Pollock Pines?

It appears to be shadowed to the North-East (Placerville-Pollock Pines) and has a clear shot of everything to the west including Sacramento!

I will look for your commnets.

Newsperson
 
newsperson said:
Newsperson responds:

Michael is that the tower just south of Placerville on Highway 49?

If so does that really place a line of sight signal over Pollock Pines?

It appears to be shadowed to the North-East (Placerville-Pollock Pines) and has a clear shot of everything to the west including Sacramento!

I will look for your commnets.

Newsperson

In looking at the map it appears to be about 5-10 south-east of Placerville. I don't know if it shadowed in Pollock Pines from that location.

Your thoughts?
 
Michael,

I looked at the application and see that it is the 92.1 FM tower. When you said KCCL I first thought of KCCL 101.9 which is on the tower near Diamond Springs and licensed to Shingle Springs.

The application is very sparse and does not address city-grade coverage like I would expect. However since it has approval now it doesn't matter.

I wounder does First Broadcasitng still own that tower? And if so how much are they charging Clear Channel for rent?

Newsperson
 
newsperson said:
Michael,

I looked at the application and see that it is the 92.1 FM tower. When you said KCCL I first thought of KCCL 101.9 which is on the tower near Diamond Springs and licensed to Shingle Springs.

The application is very sparse and does not address city-grade coverage like I would expect. However since it has approval now it doesn't matter.

I wounder does First Broadcasitng still own that tower? And if so how much are they charging Clear Channel

Newsperson

Hi Newsperson--

I'm curious who owns the KCCL tower now as well. Perhaps it was included in the transaction involving Alta and Results.

The KNTY (Formerly KCCL, KRRE, KSSJ, KFIA-FM and KLIQ) transmitter was moved to Mt. Ararat (no jokes about arks please) about 6 miles NE of the KHYL tower in El Dorado County. This happened in 1996 with the B1 to B upgrade happened for the old KSSJ. I don't know what is broadcasting off of the old Diamond Springs site if anything.

Michael
 
Michael Rivers Kramer said:
I do't know what is broadcasting off of the old Diamond Springs site if anything.

The 500' tower off Hwy 49 hosts KSPX's analog channel 29. This was channel 10's original tower prior to moving to Walnut Grove in the early 60's (to my knowledge)...

The KCCL 92.1 stick is further east of Placerville above 3000'. The new 93.1 FM will get nice coverage at 20k watts with that height, easily reaching Sac and Stockton.
 
Big D said:
Michael Rivers Kramer said:
I do't know what is broadcasting off of the old Diamond Springs site if anything.

The 500' tower off Hwy 49 hosts KSPX's analog channel 29. This was channel 10's original tower prior to moving to Walnut Grove in the early 60's (to my knowledge)...

The KCCL 92.1 stick is further east of Placerville above 3000'. The new 93.1 FM will get nice coverage at 20k watts with that height, easily reaching Sac and Stockton.
Wow, Stockton goes from losing KOSO-B93.1 to gaining this new KJDX?
 
Michael Rivers Kramer said:
Application grants for both KJDX and KOSO have been rescinded by the FCC for reasons unknown at this time.

After doing online research at fcc.gov and Google, but only seeing freezes on
(major) modifications for AM (not FM) stations, I DID find this tidbit from 2005
regards FM stations...

Perhaps this has something to do with the rescinding somehow? I dunno:
http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?topic=1525.0

OR?....
--jay
 
Newsperson responds:

Was an objection filed on this even an informal one?

The Commission is not supposed to recind anything after 50 days (although they break their own rules). Did 50 days pass on this or were they within the the 50-days?

There must be a way to find out the reason, any ideas?

Newsperson
 
newsperson said:
Newsperson responds:

Was an objection filed on this even an informal one?

The Commission is not supposed to recind anything after 50 days (although they break their own rules). Did 50 days pass on this or were they within the the 50-days?

There must be a way to find out the reason, any ideas?

Newsperson

There was no objection that I could find. The grant was rescinded less than two weeks after the grant. It could simply be a technical error. Clear Channel may have also asked the commission to rescind it due to some pending modifications.

Interesting!
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom