JakeMott said:In many other cities the extra HD programing is great. But not in Seattle. No, can't do that here.
JakeMott said:Got a response from Entercom. "Unfortunately due to demand, we've replaced smooth jazz with the Delta Blues." And replace the blues on KMTT HD2 with a new format.
Thank you! I've been saying this ever since smooth jazz was put on 100.7 hd2. The translator does put a good signal into the downtown buildings, so if people really lobbied to Entercom that they wanted the Mountain, they could simulcast that during typical work hours and go smooth jazz evenings and weekends. Given the ratings the Mountain has been getting lately, I don't think people will be lobbying Entercom for The Mountain. I wonder if the FCC would approve a move of the translator to Isaquah? What I was thinking was to move that signal to the KIRO-FM tower, that would give it a heck of a signal! That would be about a C3 signal.FMSteve said:JakeMott said:Got a response from Entercom. "Unfortunately due to demand, we've replaced smooth jazz with the Delta Blues." And replace the blues on KMTT HD2 with a new format.
WTF? So I think what they are saying indirectly is that there wasn't any demand for Smooth Jazz in this market on HD subchannels. And to "replace" SJ with Delta Blues on 100.7 channel 2 is disingenous at best because Delta Blues was already on 103.7 channel 2. So this really doesn't make sense at all. Sounds like Seattle Entercom's chief engineer gone wild, if you ask me.
I will say this again (and I hope Entercom looks at this board), HD radio will NEVER get traction in this market unless listeners are able to sample the product through the use of the FM translator service. And Entercom is in the unique position here to propell this concept forward by utilizing their 103.3 translator licensed on top of the Canned Ham building (Met Plaza).
Furthermore, Inside Radio reports that several HD2/HD3 channels are now showing up in the Arbitron Book. They cite a station in Decatur, Illonois "Magic 98.1" that is quite successful in that market with a 2.9 share (Fall 2011 book, 12+), and they utilize an FM translator, going from digital HD to analog transmission. That station is just 11 months old.
I would have to agree on the one hand, with hd channels taking more space, so I wouldn't have the position I do if Entercom didn't own the 103.3 translator, or if there wasn't one there altogether.multiplex said:JakeMott, I hope Entercom doesn't take your advice. We don't need stations taking advantage of that translator loophole to enable traction for a failed transmission method.
Analog station takes up one channel.
HD takes up two additional channels.
Translator takes yet another channel. That's four channels in all.
In Entercom'scase, they'd be using facilities they already have, but other firms could tie up many frequencies this way.
HD already takesup44 frequencies, in addition to the 22analog channels assigned to them in the Seattle area,and I'm not even counting a couple of stations like KSER and the104.9, which would add another four to that.
That means that this failed technology is using nearly half of theFM spectrum.
If it needs translators to make it listenable, then let's expand the band to accommodate more signals, turn theHD signals off and allow more stations to exist on an expanded band.
We need to use specturm wisely, not just cram all possible signals into the FM band because we can.
discjockeyjohn64 said:What a load of horse manure. They had no demand at all to move one HD format to another HD channel. Entercom just wants to play around with its HD 2 feeds.