I'm not trying to be sarcastic or facetious with the following questions, yet I am asking rhetorically.Why is providing programming that a significant number of listeners like bad for listeners?
What defines a significant number?
If radio is considered a public service, do the numbers of K-Love and Air1 listeners in each market truly make it a reasonable service? Kind of like the tree in the forest falling rhetorical question.
I'm not debating Boston specifically, and am thinking more of a station like WPLJ or the frequency that The Loop used to be on in Chicago. In market like New York or Chicago, are there enough listeners to declare the specific population of listeners as "significant?"
At the end of the day, it is a buisness. And I'm not calling out your post at all. I can equally ask these questions in a discussion about NPR. So please don't take it as disdain towards EMF or your point. Regarding Boston, I take it as a kick in the groin when seeing a station and format I enjoy go away. But they could have flipped WAAF to a country station, I would have equally had the same outlook. So that's where I become subjective, thus need to identify my being so.
What I do debate (cordially) is our heated exchange back in 2020 about the listeners' "rights (for lack of a better term)." I do believe that listeners do have the right to openly express their displeasure to the rise of EMF. It's the same as EMF having the right to continue their buisness model. I should respect it, while still not personally having to subjectively enjoy or supoort it. It's the same as not liking sea food and voicing that preference, yet still respecting the right for a Lobster restaurant to exist. (Just for full disclosure, I love sea food. I just needed a good analogy.)
My theory is if EMF made market specific programming, I would not question the company's national growth as much. There are national programming on all radio formats, yet most mix in local programming. The only other brands I can think as being comparable to K-Love is ESPN Radio and FOX Sports Radio in specific markets, where it's all the national programming lineup. I have an equal subjective displeasure towards those stations as well. Again, for full disclosure, I subscribe to SiriusXM and listen to their continental programming. So, perhaps I'm off on my stance.
Last edited: