> > It is hard to argue with a decision to kill the show if no
>
> > students are involved. Seems to me if people want this or
> > something like it to return they should start getting
> > students involved in the production and on-air broadcast
> and
> > make it not about the show but about the education.
> >
> > Great idea bad implementation of resources.
> >
> >
> > http://seattletimes>
> >
> .nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002406504_radiostation28m.html
>
> >
> > >
> > I agree. What's more, the show's "talent" was
> irresponsible on more than one occasion. From my source, it
> was said there were "repeated abuses" of commentary and
> opinion on-air. There were known to be at least 4 different
> cases over the last 8 months were the host just felt like
> venting and did not understand his conflict of interest nor
> his offense to the receiver side of things.
>
> The students did not enjoy working with this guy and
> apparently they all had quit after a month on the
> show....what else could the SD do but pull the plug? No one
> in com radio would have put up with a guy who couldn't even
> get the legal ID's on at the right time.....
I didn't realize that it was the only "live show" on the station...I thought they did live stuff, but honestly I really haven't listened more than a couple of times...
>