• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KNGY just misses a no hitter!

S

simonsays

Oh so close... #40 out of 42 stations listed in the Winter trends. Has to be the worst 12+ showing in the frequency's history. About as close to a skunking as you can get.

But of course, that's 12+ and I'll be chastised again by you know. Yeah, 12+ is irrelevant. I'm sure Energy is breaking out the champagne and celebrating their non 12+ successes.
 
> Oh so close... #40 out of 42 stations listed in the Winter
> trends. Has to be the worst 12+ showing in the frequency's
> history. About as close to a skunking as you can get.
>
> But of course, that's 12+ and I'll be chastised again by you
> know. Yeah, 12+ is irrelevant. I'm sure Energy is breaking
> out the champagne and celebrating their non 12+ successes.
>
who cares? everyone knows that 92.7 is never going to get ratings higher than a 1.0. Why? because its a small signal<P ID="signature">______________
http://natedoggairchecks.6x.to/
sfradio (at) gmail (dot) com</P>
 
> Oh so close... #40 out of 42 stations listed in the Winter
> trends. Has to be the worst 12+ showing in the frequency's
> history. About as close to a skunking as you can get.

From the looks of the discreet demos and extraps, it looks like the station is really close to being out of the book by not meeting MRS standards.
 
Just looking over the entire list appears that most signals have droppd by at least .1 --- with a few exceptions. Is this just that less people listened to radio over all through that ratings period?

That being said, the trend is not lookign friendly. What was KNGY doing different when they had a 1.0 share, than they are now?



> > Oh so close... #40 out of 42 stations listed in the Winter
>
> > trends. Has to be the worst 12+ showing in the
> frequency's
> > history. About as close to a skunking as you can get.
> >
> > But of course, that's 12+ and I'll be chastised again by
> you
> > know. Yeah, 12+ is irrelevant. I'm sure Energy is
> breaking
> > out the champagne and celebrating their non 12+ successes.
>
> >
> who cares? everyone knows that 92.7 is never going to get
> ratings higher than a 1.0. Why? because its a small signal
>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom