• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Kool 105.3: No jocks, no spots.

I do not live in Louisiana but I did read about Kool 105.3 going to the Internet so I listened to it this morning. Hear are some comments.

1. The same, safe playlist with the same tested and burnt out 300 oldies in rotation.
2. No jocks just liners between songs and you can tell when they were doing the format on FM when the jock would have come in and said his or her liner.
3. No spots while listening for quite a while.

Is this attempt at playing oldies going to eventually have jocks or spots on the net at its streaming website?

I also don't buy the argument about WWL missing by the FM audience. They have a 50,000 watt signal on 870 so why simulcast it?

It's just another station taking oldies off regular over the air radio.
 
> I do not live in Louisiana but I did read about Kool 105.3
> going to the Internet so I listened to it this morning.
> Hear are some comments.
>
> 1. The same, safe playlist with the same tested and burnt
> out 300 oldies in rotation.
> 2. No jocks just liners between songs and you can tell when
> they were doing the format on FM when the jock would have
> come in and said his or her liner.
> 3. No spots while listening for quite a while.
>
> Is this attempt at playing oldies going to eventually have
> jocks or spots on the net at its streaming website?
>
> I also don't buy the argument about WWL missing by the FM
> audience. They have a 50,000 watt signal on 870 so why
> simulcast it?
>
> It's just another station taking oldies off regular over the
> air radio.
>
i think it was done to get ready for the wrno switch..<P ID="signature">______________
note to the NAB..satellite radio..its worth paying for!!</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom