• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KPFK to make "urgent changes" in programming

From the LA Observed site, the following memo was sent today to programmers as a precursor to cancelling non-performing shows. Apparently, there are a lot of candidates. Why would they give these people a choice as to how to handle this? If the product sucks, show them the door. Aren't most, if not all, volunteers? Another day at the circus...and a tremendous ongoing waste of a killer signal.

From: Alan Minsky
Sent: Wed 7/21/2010
To: programmers; staff
Cc: Bob Conger; Jennifer Kiser; Alan Minsky
Subject: Important Letter to KPFK Programmers
Dear KPFKers,

We've reached a critical point at KPFK, as the painful length of our recent fund drive betrayed.

At the beginning of my time as iPD, I was instructed by the National Office to increase the station's listeners; in particular, as measured by the Arbitron numbers. This has occurred. Through the beginning of June, the listenership for the station had steadily risen from 120,000 before the fall 2009 programming changes up to a plateau of 180,000. This is great.

However, the increase in audience is weighted almost entirely in our Monday through Friday morning programming - in essence from 6am until 1pm - while 5pm is also substantially out-performing what was there before. With only a few exceptions, the afternoon, evening, and weekend programming is dramatically underperforming by this measurement.

Furthermore, this is true not only in terms of Arbitrons but also in fundraising - as we consistently have to pre-empt our afternoon, evening, and weekend programs in order to raise money. This is unacceptable. Lew Hill, Pacifica's founder, understood that listeners would pay for what they value; that compelling programming would elicit the financial support required to sustain such an ambitious media project and broadcast operation; that the ability to fundraise would necessarily be a factor in determining what shows remain on the air.

Indeed, the fact that so many of our shows are not contributing to fundraising for KPFK is a major factor in the unacceptable length of our fund drives.

Therefore, I along with the current management team see an urgent need to make changes in the programming in the afternoon, evening, and weekend.

In the next few weeks, we will be making some very hard decisions. We have about eight to ten new hours of Mission-driven programming that we believe will dramatically improve our listenership and our fundraising in the coming year. In order to make room for these new shows, we need some of the underperforming shows to step aside.

Therefore, we are asking all KPFK programmers to take a hard look at their shows and decide themselves whether they can make a positive contribution to the station by increasing their audience size and raising money for the station in fund drives. If you recognize that your show cannot make such a contribution than we, the management team, would encourage you to either:

1. offer to cut the length of your show (e.g. from one hour to 30 minutes a week)
2. move your show off-air to a web-based show available on KPFK.org
3. end your show

We will wait to hear back from programmers for one and a half weeks (until 07-30), after which time we will begin to make the decisions about which shows to cut back and which to excise in order to free up the time to introduce new programming onto KPFK Radio. Please reply directly to myself, Bob Conger and Jennifer Kiser.

This is a difficult process, but essential for the greater good and health of the station and foundation.
 
radio1015a said:
From the LA Observed site, the following memo was sent today to programmers as a precursor to cancelling non-performing shows. Apparently, there are a lot of candidates. Why would they give these people a choice as to how to handle this? If the product sucks, show them the door. Aren't most, if not all, volunteers? Another day at the circus...and a tremendous ongoing waste of a killer signal.

I think the way they are doing this reflects the Pacifica culture.

On the other hand, the numbers KPFK has in Arbitron are pretty much inside the "margin of error" range, so there is no guarantee that any particular time has more or less audience... they are so close to "0.0 at all times.

To put things in perspective, we have nearly a dozen stations in LA with cume figures above 2 million, and the top one has around 3.5 million. I can see why, at 180,000 cume, they have trouble raising money.

Whether I like the programming, voices like KPFK are needed. I hope they are successful in building a stronger base of support.
 
Here's what it comes down to. They aren't bringing in enough money in pledges. In that regard it's very simple to see
what shows are succeeding more than others.
What is unfortunate for the show programmers is that until now there was no premium placed on numerical success
or the wideness of appeal of a program. In fact diversity was the focus. I frankly could not figure out how they were surviving.
We know they got that huge signal for a song way back when. It's worth a fortune now so you have to applaud them for not selling.

I think there would be a good middle ground if they'd allow for some less obscure and higher quality shows, but the management by selecting these 10 new hours of programming have put themselves in the position where, if it fails it will be their fault alone.
 
An attempt to steal this station has been made before. This time the perpetrators are just more stealthy and have successfully run the programming into the ground. I don't really know what is on it anymore--there might be good things--my friends and I all quit listening long ago. Sometimes I listen to Roy of Hollywood stuff after midnight but abandoned daytime long ago since it had become the near exclusive domain of leftist lunatic fringe elements. The founders of Pacifica would have been shocked to hear the racist, Stalinist, Maoist absurdities that came to dominate KPFK programming in the last decade or two. I used to like to hear the views of the left on KPFK but rational people couldn't support that sort of thing and consequently the station is ripe for the pickings once again. This time it's unlikely there will be a base left to save it. I wouldn't be surprised to see it become a Spanish language music/talk format within the next year.
 
The difficulty in public radio is how much do you change programming before sounding close to other pubcasters, too. It's a balancing act.
 
If ratings donations are lagging and new change is required, why not try all-capitalist radio? It couldn't do any worse.

Oh, right, it wouldn't fit the mission of communications for comrades. Well soldier on then. Peacefully, of course.

One day relevance will find you. Or not.
 
travisl5678 said:
Sorry I get them mixed up, are they both NPR Affilates?

They both are, but KCRW plays music and has little or no local news department. KPCC is the dominant NPR station in terms of listenership and budget. KPCC has a strong news department and is a smaller version of KQED/SF.

KCRW is the "cool little NPR station" with fewer listeners. At least they don't claim to be the NPR flagship of LA anymore.

Combined, these two stations probably have as many total listeners (unduplicated) as KQED in San Francisco. Neither KCRW nor KPCC cume more than 580,000. Whereas KQED cumes around 800,000.
 
I've lived in both LA and the Bay Area (not lately), and found I favored the quality and variety of public radio in Los Angeles over San Francisco. On the other hand, I think in general commercial radio in the Bay Area showed a bit more class and creativity than its counterparts in the Southland. (ex: KCBS is the kind of spot news station every market should have, tho' KNX isn't half bad either - just not as "vital," apparently, to the LA population as a whole).

Since the Minnesota folks started programming KPCC, it's become a top-notch NPR talk station in my opinion. I like how they add brief news updates in the mid-program breaks, and always offer your something besides underwriting announcements and IDs. And I even thought KPFK sounded a bit more professional (just a bit, mind you) than granddaddy KPFA in Berkeley. SF's KQED and KALW, on the other hand, often have local insert announcers who sound tired and bored, and the program schedule seems a bit wooden at times to me.
 
I think SF could use a good public radio music station. I've often heard in my head an SF version of KCRW - very multicultural and upbeat, similar to what's being done at Radio Milwaukee (WYMS 88.9.)
 
The worst news about KPFK, however, is the fact that someone in Tijuana has re-activated a 90.7 transmitter and is wreaking horrible interference to KPFK in San Diego and Orange county. It just started a couple of days ago.
 
Don Mussell said:
The worst news about KPFK, however, is the fact that someone in Tijuana has re-activated a 90.7 transmitter and is wreaking horrible interference to KPFK in San Diego and Orange county. It just started a couple of days ago.

--Just watch to see who winds up with this station. It's going to be stolen.
 
WTFman said:
Don Mussell said:
The worst news about KPFK, however, is the fact that someone in Tijuana has re-activated a 90.7 transmitter and is wreaking horrible interference to KPFK in San Diego and Orange county. It just started a couple of days ago.

--Just watch to see who winds up with this station. It's going to be stolen.

What's the worst thing that could happen to KPFK? I doubt that it'll end up a "Rush Radio" outlet...
 
charles hobbs said:
What's the worst thing that could happen to KPFK? I doubt that it'll end up a "Rush Radio" outlet...

The worst may have already happened. KPFK is still reeling from former GM Eva Georgia's reign of terror. Pacifica is still settling lawsuits from then, all either discrimination or harrassment suits, and that's where most of the donation money lately is going. Pacifica founder Lewis Hill had always promised to level with the public on internal Pacifica matters, but he is long gone, and the modern day Pacifica management has totally kept their listeners in the dark regarding this.

Last add Eva Georgia: She was hired in spite of many red flags in her past, and she left with shells bursting all around her. If I was a contributor to KPFK, I'd want to know just who was responsible for her hiring. If they're still there, I'd want them out.

I seriously doubt that it could ever turn into a "Rush Radio" outlet even if it wanted to. By FCC law, yes, they still have some regulations, stations between 88.1 and 91.9 have to be non-commercial, and licensed to a college, university, public agency, church, or non-profit foundation.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom