Time for the monthly check-in. KPLS is still dead.

And...at 6 pm, they're off again.
Meanwhile, a silent STA request was filed on Tuesday (finally), stating:
The station went off the air on December 18, 2024, when the station’s transmitter site was struck by lightning.
However, lightning in Denver in December would be unusual. The following screenshot from lightningmaps.org doesn't show any lightning in Colorado on that date, nor on any other date in December before the 18th. There was more lightning activity than usual in December on the 18th but none in Colorado.
It wouldn't surprise me if there were a demand for a further explanation.
Except, in this case, it took them until September before filing the STA request. That's not a good look.I doubt it. The FCC generally accepts whatever explanation the station offers without question
thats happened before with stations, they file an sta months after the silence. the sttaion will get an admonishment, warned if they do it again, theres trouble.. or they might get a small fine.. and if they did, i guarentee they could pleasd it down or get it eliminated.Except, in this case, it took them until September before filing the STA request. That's not a good look.
They're still rubber-stamping WFME's STAs despite previously warning Family Radio that they need to make real progress towards restoring a permanent transmission site for the station.The FCC is not delete/fine happy like thhey used to be
One thing to point out here: the main issue is that the licensee waited more than nine months before reporting its silent status to the Commission. I don't think that will just be waved off, at least not initially.
Silent notifications are related to the statutory loss of license for stations silent more than one year. This is not something that the staff or commission can just blow off.I've seen it happen and I can't recall many times when the licensee got much more than a peepee slap in recent memory.
but this station hasn't been off more than a year... thats one thing if they were. youre kinda looking for a problem/creating one/being even mroe stingy with the rules than the commish is.Silent notifications are related to the statutory loss of license for stations silent more than one year. This is not something that the staff or commission can just blow off.
The station actually went off the air on December 10th. I'm not sure why they would say the 18th. I know that because I was off from work that day. I heard them in the morning but that night, they were off the air. I kept checking and they never did come back until this week.And...at 6 pm, they're off again.
Meanwhile, a silent STA request was filed on Tuesday (finally), stating:
The station went off the air on December 18, 2024, when the station’s transmitter site was struck by lightning.
A station can make a showing of financial hardship to the staff, though that means opening up the books. This doesn’t seem to be rare and does result in a reduction of the fine (in at least one case I’ve seen, involving LPTVs in southeastern Colorado, the fine was eliminated altogether after financial statements were provided, backing up the plea of poverty) in conjunction with a plan to ensure future compliance. So the FCC does account for financial exigencies as long as there’s a plan for making sure the regulatory fault doesn’t happen again.A possible reason why the FCC is so lenient with reporting when a station is off the air is that there are not many options left. If the FCC were to fine a station like this with a shoestring budget, it might force them off the air permanently. And, if that happened, who would want to take over the license of a AM station on the upper end of the dial? Chances are the frequency would go dark.
A station can make a showing of financial hardship to the staff, though that means opening up the books. This doesn’t seem to be rare and does result in a reduction of the fine (in at least one case I’ve seen, involving LPTVs in southeastern Colorado, the fine was eliminated altogether after financial statements were provided, backing up the plea of poverty) in conjunction with a plan to ensure future compliance. So the FCC does account for financial exigencies as long as there’s a plan for making sure the regulatory fault doesn’t happen again.
My point, which everyone seems to be missing here, is that waiting nine months to make a formal filing for a silent STA (note, not a silent notification, which is short-term, but an STA that’s longer-term) is highly likely to result in further regulatory action.
As if you had not read what I had written, which basically stated that any threatened fine can be (and has been) reduced or even waived upon evidence of economic hardship.No, were not missing it, what we are saying is the regulatory action won't be as severe as you seem to think it will be.