it would cost way too much to build to a brand new station which would require multiple towersJust wanted to know now that KPRO is no more will another broadcaster take over 1570. I know the land has more value
Than the station itself. What does everyone think?
Who would want it? If the license was turned in, then someone else would have to file for a brand new station. And the FCC is not taking apps for new daytimers.Just wanted to know now that KPRO is no more will another broadcaster take over 1570. I know the land has more value
Than the station itself. What does everyone think?
First, 1570 and 1580 are dreadful, terrible high-band frequencies. Second,. the ground conductivity in Southern California declines as one goes inland from LA. 1580 is highly directional to the West; it has nearly no signal towards the East or Southeast; it protects the Mexican border among other things. At night, it is even worse as it protects the 1580 clear channel in Hermosillo, Sonora (which migrated but is still a Mexican clear channel).How did 1570 not interfere with 1580 in L.A?
At night, it is even worse as it protects the 1580 clear channel in Hermosillo, Sonora (which migrated but is still a Mexican clear channel).
Yep, that is just as expected. The transmitter site is a couple of miles east of MacArthur Park and the day signal goes mostly in a 180° arc to the west. At night, it is a flashlight beam going roughly west/southwest. At night, even Glendale, Burbank and such are poor or just not there.I lived in Los Angeles, about 10 miles south/west of downtown, and KDAY had a strong, city-grade signal. In 1979, we moved to La Verne, about 35 miles east of LA. KDAY during the day was faint, and at night, was almost always covered by XEDM Hermosillo. In the morning, KNIX in Phoenix overrode KDAY.
mind that 1 kw on 550 covers (if all other things like antenna and location are the same) as well as 50 kw at 1500 on the AM dial.