• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KRCM in the Woodlands now?

I noticed that KRCM (1380) had ceased its broadcasting in Beaumont recently. Have they finally moved to the Woodlands area?
 
Yes..construction was finished on the new transmitter site barely in time before the CP expired on May 15th. Their application for license (FCC Form 302) was accepted for filing on May 27th. Unless something goes very wrong, they should be granted a license as a Shenandoah station soon. What Voice Broadcasting does with the facility is anyone's guess.
 
TexasTuner said:
What Voice Broadcasting does with the facility is anyone's guess.

Something probably insignificant, to go along with the facility, but I wish them luck. This is like running a three-year long marathon then discovering you're the only one in the race. And you get no gold medal, just a puny upper-band virtual daytime-only AM station.
 
mrbeasley said:
You're right about the puny signal. I doesn't even make it to Conroe.

Isn't the transmitter closer to Conroe than The Woodlands? I never understood the theory behind this move.
 
stan said:
Isn't the transmitter closer to Conroe than The Woodlands?

There has been some confusion about this one due to a number of modifications to applications along the way. The Conroe site along loop 336 was in the original proposal back in 2004 and it was for 600 watts daytime only; there was also a proposal that called for 480 watts daytime (and 7 at night?) but I can't locate that one. Unless something changed*, the authorized site (in the proposal for 250 day/69 watts night) is about four miles east of I-45 and a little over a mile south of 242 near the Tamina community.

In looking back through the paperwork I noticed a lot of things that weren't quite right or had been neglected. For instance, the engineering narrative originally stated that the transmitter site would be about 10 kilometers north of Shenandoah. That would have placed it near the southern edge of Conroe (the 600 watt site?), but in reality the coordinates listed in the approved application correspond with the Tamina site (4 miles, or about 6 km east of Shenandoah). That's a flood plain area, virtually along the western bank of the San Jacinto River, and that subject came up when they applied for the two-tower 10kW directional pattern for daytime. I don't think it had been mentioned previously. In connection with that ill-fated application the consulting engineer admitted that the site had been under about 11 feet of water during flooding back in 1994. I never heard if the environmental issues were fully addressed but if the FCC was really concerned about it, it shouldn't have mattered how many towers would be located there. After all, they had already issued a construction permit for one-tower operation the year before.

(*) I'm open to any corrections on this, but what I see is that the construction permit was issued under the file number BMJP-20050118ADX. If that's correct, it seems that the folks at Radio-Locator were looking at the wrong application (the original from '04, or its later version in '07).
 
stan said:
mrbeasley said:
You're right about the puny signal. I doesn't even make it to Conroe.

Isn't the transmitter closer to Conroe than The Woodlands? I never understood the theory behind this move.

Very simple...even as a daytimer, KRCM's worth a hell of a lot more covering a small bit of North Houston than it ever was over in Beaumont. I suspect it'll be sold before the year's out.
 
It isn't worth much this afternoon. I was in Shenadoah, @ Hwy 242, and tuned it in. Nothing but noise and static for the hour I was in the area.
 
mrbeasley said:
It isn't worth much this afternoon. I was in Shenadoah, @ Hwy 242, and tuned it in. Nothing but noise and static for the hour I was in the area.

If they are on the air, what are they broadcasting?
 
Not sure what they're playing. I have yet to hear anything from it. Seems as though they got the thing on the air just long enough to file for a license to cover the CP; then just turned it off. I suspect that, with the short fuse they were on, that they never got it totally built.
 
It is not on the air. If Voice turned on the Shenandoah site at any point, it was short lived. The new station should hit my workplace without any problem. I check it everyday...as any good radio nerd would...and it's never been there. I caught KRCM one time a while back, posted here, and found out I was picking up the Beaumont signal from stan. If it's now off in Beaumont, it's off period.
 
Knowing the short time frame they had to get the construction work done; my guess is that they didn't get it finished before the deadline on the construction permit. If they filed for a license to cover without having finished it correctly, according to the CP; this would be illegal. You have to build it according to what you specified, and the FCC approved, in the application BEFORE you file for a license. They are probably still working on it.
 
mrbeasley said:
Knowing the short time frame they had to get the construction work done; my guess is that they didn't get it finished before the deadline on the construction permit. If they filed for a license to cover without having finished it correctly, according to the CP; this would be illegal. You have to build it according to what you specified, and the FCC approved, in the application BEFORE you file for a license. They are probably still working on it.

I can say I've seen the site, tower and all. Transmitter building, ATU, etc. Can I testify I've heard it on the air? No, I can't. Several others have said they've done so, however.
 
They could have had it on the air for one day, then took it dark on an STA. But, if the tower and transmitter are there; why would they? Still sounds like they never got it on the air as permitted.
 
My bet is that it never makes it on the air, and if it ever does, will never have the coverage or make the revenue originally anticipated. We're seeing the same thing with KSET in the Triangle and their poor coverage which doesn't cover the area as originally promised.
 
stan, just curious, but do you know if there's anything left at the Beaumont site?
 
I think the tower on Fannett road was damaged around the time of Hurricane Rita, if I recall correctly. The old tower was removed and they put up a temporary tower there for awhile. After the decision to move to the Conroe area, they eventually shut down the broadcasting here in Beaumont and took the temporary tower down.

After the delay in getting on the air at their new location, they filed an application with the FCC to go back on the air in the Beaumont area temporarily at a site northeast of College and Langham in Beaumont, using a long wire antenna, I believe. They simulcast KLBT (88.1 FM) when their audio was working. Often there was dead air, and I don't think I ever heard KRCM used as the legal ID, just the KLBT ID from the simulcast FM broadcast. Of course, I could have missed an ID placed other than at the top of the hour.

http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/getimportletter_exh.cgi?import_letter_id=12462
 
KRCM has filed for an STA to stay dark. The COL is still shown as Beaumont in the filing. Filing number: BLSTA20100607AFH.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom