Steve Eberhart said:
In an AM/FM simulcast it is perfectly acceptable to say KRLD AM/FM Dallas, for example.
Saying KRLD AM/HD Dallas would fall under said same.
Begging to differ on its acceptability, since as stated above, it's not technically
correct--but also as noted, Uncle Charlie probably won't be coming after KRLD
for their indiscretion. What do you expect from a bunch of doofus bureaucrats
who can't see the forest for the trees? Or in radio's case, the I-CRAP polluting
the adjacent frequencies. :
To be really "ID anal" about it (and I am ;D), for starters "AM" is not part of an
AM station's callsign, also each station in a simulcast should be IDed separately
(calls and COL):
"KRLD Dallas, KRLD HD Dallas, KRLD-FM HD2 Dallas"
As previously mentioned, there are no multiple HD channels on AM for those who
choose to "pollute by I-CRAP," so it's just "HD" not "HD1."
With each COL mention you can also tack on any other place(s) desired, as long
as the COL is first, and Metroplex courtesy would want "Dallas/Fort Worth" to be
enunciated to avoid things like range wars, checkpoints on the Bob Crandall Toll
Road through DFW, and late-night visits from the ghost of Amon Carter.
"KRLD Dallas/Fort Worth, KRLD HD Dallas/Fort Worth, KRLD-FM HD2 Dallas/Fort Worth"
would be totally legal--as well as appeasing to both the I-35E and I-35W camps--
assuming these are the three broadcast channels simulcasting the 1080 programming.
All in all, I feel a "Fybush moment" coming on... ;D