I agree with Super. This has been the most tedious thread since... well, a long time.
Don't get me wrong, I am not pointing any fingers at any individual poster or group of posters, you all have your valid points (well, for the most part anyway). This has been one long discussion between programmers and insiders who want to play whatever drives every last rating point, regardless of how much such programming may cheapen, degrade, and ultimately destroy the overall concept of radio, which I assume we all love and want to see succeed. On the other hand there are those who are holding onto what radio used to be and just can't get that the radio they want has gone the way of the dodo bird for a reason. The truth of course, is somewhere in the middle, but none of us is likely to ever find it. The two sides are going to keep on talking past each other.
I see both sides. The kid in me who grew up with radio, loves not just what it was, but what it could be, and knows what good radio sounds like, hates what the radio business has become and what it has done to the medium I once loved. But my head knows you cannot tell people what to like, and if they are going to like Lil' Wayne, Pink, Cyrus and Gaga (or others who are even worse), I can't make them like what I like instead, so you might as well play what they want to hear - who are we to fight it? I am thankful that my ecclectic, weird, sometimes sophisticated, but sometimes even campy tastes can be satisfied via other mediums and I am not forced to listen to garbage like Kanye just because he is popular. I am not old, but I will never again be in the KIIS/KAMP target demo and will not be listening to that kind of product. But even though I can program my own music, it is not a substitute for good radio. There is no substitute for good radio.
Don't get me wrong, I am not pointing any fingers at any individual poster or group of posters, you all have your valid points (well, for the most part anyway). This has been one long discussion between programmers and insiders who want to play whatever drives every last rating point, regardless of how much such programming may cheapen, degrade, and ultimately destroy the overall concept of radio, which I assume we all love and want to see succeed. On the other hand there are those who are holding onto what radio used to be and just can't get that the radio they want has gone the way of the dodo bird for a reason. The truth of course, is somewhere in the middle, but none of us is likely to ever find it. The two sides are going to keep on talking past each other.
I see both sides. The kid in me who grew up with radio, loves not just what it was, but what it could be, and knows what good radio sounds like, hates what the radio business has become and what it has done to the medium I once loved. But my head knows you cannot tell people what to like, and if they are going to like Lil' Wayne, Pink, Cyrus and Gaga (or others who are even worse), I can't make them like what I like instead, so you might as well play what they want to hear - who are we to fight it? I am thankful that my ecclectic, weird, sometimes sophisticated, but sometimes even campy tastes can be satisfied via other mediums and I am not forced to listen to garbage like Kanye just because he is popular. I am not old, but I will never again be in the KIIS/KAMP target demo and will not be listening to that kind of product. But even though I can program my own music, it is not a substitute for good radio. There is no substitute for good radio.