While I see what you’re saying, I think this is a totally valid question. If you’re going to start shifting into more 90’s programming, it seems like it would make sense to include more of it. Perhaps they don’t want to stretch the playlist too far or throw in anything that would miss the mark with their listeners.
While it may seem to be a snarky comeback, "your target audience only ages one year at a time. None of it ages any faster".
So the issue with any station that plays music from a window in time is whether to age with the listeners or to maintain the target, bringing in "new" listeners and ceasing to care about the oldest ones, one year at a time.
The way that is done is measuring the appeal of every played song and every reasonable potential song among the target listeners, which ever philosophy as to the target age group is employed.
Example: "Music of Your Life" done by Al Ham formatted many radio stations with Big Band era tunes, and gradually introduced remakes of songs originating in that era by newer (read "younger" or "not deceased") artists. But it maintained one foot and most of the toes of the other in the original era.
- Music of Your Life has been broadcasting hit records from the Great American Songbook non-stop for 40 years, making it the longest running syndicated music radio network in the world. Founder Al Ham introduced his “Matched Flow Sequencing” in 1978, combining standards with contemporary hits to compliment his unique sound.
That policy resulted in a format that was jokingly called, "Music of the Remaining Years of Your Life". It aged out, so far out that it's now mostly a streaming proposition as no radio station can successfully target people in their 80's and beyond. f
With that being said, when the shift inevitably happens, they’re naturally going to need other stuff to play, and therefore, I was wondering why they haven’t tried to throw at least some of them in to prepare listeners for that transition. I think that’s a fair question, as it seems like it would paint KRTH into a corner.
The purpose of radio is not to "create tastes" but to reflect them. We don't "train" listeners to like songs; we play songs they like already.
There is no need to "prepare" listeners for anything. Just play the songs that today's target audience likes, and don't play the ones that no longer appeal to everyone within that target.
So, each time KRTH tests its library and all the songs it
might play (I say this because many seem to believe radio does not test songs that they don't play... we do... lots of them.) they are looking for songs that have entered the target age range window and also trying to identify any that impede the younger end from listening.
Add in the fact that there are also some songs that just get tired... they either get rested and tried again or they are eliminated.
There are no fast spinning gears in this mechanism. A few songs age out, a few burn out, a few become acceptable to the entire age range and are added.