• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KRTY-FM Los Gatos has been sold

In Nielsen, 95% of the at home and at work listening is in the 65 dbu coverage area. EMF knows that, and when they can't get a great signal, they cover a market with bad ones, knowing each one will only "work" in its primary coverage area.
The stations all put out a good signal in most of the area.
Hatred is a strong word. I resent what EMF is doing, and the fact that they, like all religious broadcasters, exploit rules that give them an unfair advantage. In my view policy failures allow an organization like that to remove mass-appeal entertainment channels from a very limited broadcast spectrum and replace them with a type of evangelism most people don't want to be subjected to, where something fun existed before. In fact, if there's anyone pushing one-sided, "my way is the only way" beliefs here, it's EMF.
David is a broadcaster so when he usually says comes from business site of broadcasting.

As for the EMF vultures, many dislike what they are doing. One of my long time favourite stations fell to them. They were profitable and when the owners decided to sell, there was 2 parties interested, one that would keep the station as is and the EMF. Since the owners wanted out and EMF offered a tad more, the station went to them.
 
David, I always know the types of rebuttals you'll write to my critical posts and I do respect your knowledge about the business of radio, but sometimes I feel like you're like Baghdad Bob, the Iraqi information minister telling everyone it's all an illusion and there's nothing to see here.
There are two kinds of audience figures: cume and AQH. Radio's cume is off by about 5% since 1995.

Radio's AQH is off by more, but in the top 48 markets, much more than half of that is due to the PPM which reduced average Y2K weekly listening hours from around 21 to 11 to 12 depending on the market. On top of that, the variety of new media has brought that down from 11 to 12 hours to around 9 hours in 18+ listeners as a whole.
Maybe you can tell us what the overall radio audience is today compared to, say, 5, 10, 15 years ago. You know as well as I do that it's a constant downward slope, in fact you've mentioned the actual numbers in other threads, and it's pretty dramatic.
The amount of time spent with radio people are talking about lately is influenced by the pandemic. We are nearly at the pre-pandemic levels again, and that means that OTA radio is getting an average of 9 hours a week per person among adults. What is less evident is that some of the loss to AM and FM has gone to streams of the same stations. But the AFTRA rules prevent stations from streaming most agency spots, so the numbers are often lost. As all audio is measured in one product, we'll see how station streams do in the future.
It's declining for a combination of reasons but you can't dismiss how people feel when EMF kills their favorite stations, and the effect things like that have on people's perception of what radio offers them any more when entertainment is replaced by dogma. The decline is real, and the role these religious hijackers play in it is real too.
Nearly all the EMF conversions were failed stations. They had little audience and in many cases the EMF formats have done as well as or better than the former format. And they released dollars to the remaining commercial stations.
Hatred is a strong word. I resent what EMF is doing, and the fact that they, like all religious broadcasters, exploit rules that give them an unfair advantage.
Goodwill and the Red Cross and St. Jude's Hospital all get the same treatment. They are organizations that do not seek profit and don't distribute income or pay dividends.
In my view policy failures allow an organization like that to remove mass-appeal entertainment channels from a very limited broadcast spectrum and replace them with a type of evangelism most people don't want to be subjected to, where something fun existed before. In fact, if there's anyone pushing one-sided, "my way is the only way" beliefs here, it's EMF.
Then why in many markets are either the EMF or commercial contemporary Christian stations in the top 5? In LA, while we had numbers, the EMF station that replaced a rock station was getting higher ratings than the old format.

EMF's format is definitely mass appeal. As an example, there is a contemporary Christian station in Puerto Rico in Spanish that is on a couple of Class A FMs and it often is in the Top 5 overall stations, even if it only covers about 50% to 60% of the market. That is top 5 in a 120 station market!
 
The stations all put out a good signal in most of the area.
"Good" is subjective. Are there areas where they would not have a 65dbu signal if they turned off one or more of the stations?
David is a broadcaster so when he usually says comes from business site of broadcasting.
Even if you run a non-commercial station, you are still running an enterprise. It's just the financing that is different.
As for the EMF vultures, many dislike what they are doing. One of my long time favourite stations fell to them. They were profitable and when the owners decided to sell, there was 2 parties interested, one that would keep the station as is and the EMF. Since the owners wanted out and EMF offered a tad more, the station went to them.
If you are selling your house, do you take the low offer instead of the high one?
 
I see. Thanks for the info. I can see why so many South Bay stations have either gone non-comm or ethnic, but the shrinking availability of mainstream programming only serves to accelerate the market's shrinking relevance, in my opinion.

The impending demise of one of its most popular stations is a real kick to the gut. 97.7 going to EMF didn't bother me because KFOG hadn't been relevant in years (plus programming was still available to many via 104.5) and was clearly on death's doorstep anyway. The KRTY situation is much different in that it is a very popular station in Santa Clara County. I also believe they underpaid for KRTY. I'm more angry at the executor or trustee of the estate than I am at EMF, frankly. THEY are the one(s) who allowed this outcome to occur!
 
The impending demise of one of its most popular stations is a real kick to the gut. 97.7 going to EMF didn't bother me because KFOG hadn't been relevant in years (plus programming was still available to many via 104.5) and was clearly on death's doorstep anyway.
But that is a classic case of a format that became irrelevant due to changing ethnicity and market demographics. It's a good example.
The KRTY situation is much different in that it is a very popular station in Santa Clara County.
Remember, a big part of this is that the revenue in San Jose as a separate market has nearly dried up. Population: 38th nationally. Radio revenue: 101st nationally,

In 2021 KVVF, KEZR and KBAY all tied or exceeded them in billing. They were down to a level that likely was very close to no longer being profitable. And, now that I think about it, I wonder if a negative cash flow made the estate administrators take the first solid offer that came along?
 
"Good" is subjective. Are there areas where they would not have a 65dbu signal if they turned off one or more of the stations?

Even if you run a non-commercial station, you are still running an enterprise. It's just the financing that is different.

If you are selling your house, do you take the low offer instead of the high one?
1. 3 of the frequencies are the same tower. 1 is a directional signal. One of the guys in the amateur radio club is also an engineer for many stations in our area as well the next state over. He drives around the whole area with measuring equipment taking readings and 4 of the signals hit all areas. The directional one is aimed at a valley that has issues with signals.

2. That's a given.

3. I'm not sure what selling houses have to do with broadcasting.
 
3. I'm not sure what selling houses have to do with broadcasting.
If I am selling a station, I go for the highest price. If I have lenders, they will force me to go for it.
 
I cannot help but wonder if a GoFundMe campaign or some other crowdfunding campaign would've resulted in more than the $3.1 million that EMF is paying. (Granted, I don't know what liabilities EMF may be assuming pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement.)
 
Theater of the Mind: I bet you never listened to Air One or K-Love. The reason I say that is because your comments about them are not anywhere close to their programming. Both are music intensive formats void of preaching. They hire major market talent and use major market programming tactics common to any music format. How do I know? I have a very part-time job and they insist on playing Air One in the store. Most critics don't even know what is aired on their stations. I'm not saying this is you but I sort of wonder what has happened to us when people disparage things they are clueless about.

And I can say this, EMF has been a good broadcast partner for a friend who had a limited budget with his station. EMF loaned a piece of equipment until repairs on their own were done and the engineer did a few hundred bucks of free work. In other words, not unlike a good station would have done to help a fellow broadcaster facing a rough time.

By the way, the latest data I've seen, Christian programming attracts 8% of radio listeners. Of that 57% listen to Contemporary Christian, Praise & Worship music stations. All other forms of Christin radio reach 43% of that 8%.

Here is a fact about Air One, K-Love, Way FM and the sort: they do not try to convert you to Christianity. That is NOT their audience. Their audience is the churchgoer who needs not be 'saved' or 'sold' on Christianity. They are already Christians. So, in a nutshell anybody that says otherwise simply does not have a clue about what they are claiming.

Being someone that would not normally ever listen to the format, working in a place with not too much going on, I tried to crack their format. I paid attention to all the elements of their programming. It's really pretty interesting.
 
Hatred is a strong word. I resent what EMF is doing, and the fact that they, like all religious broadcasters, exploit rules that give them an unfair advantage. In my view policy failures allow an organization like that to remove mass-appeal entertainment channels from a very limited broadcast spectrum and replace them with a type of evangelism most people don't want to be subjected to, where something fun existed before. In fact, if there's anyone pushing one-sided, "my way is the only way" beliefs here, it's EMF.
This is very close to the way I feel personally. And I am, on the whole, conflicted. On the one hand, having operators like EMF, VCY, Relevant, Bott, and the like has the effect of removing commercial competitors whenever they acquire or affiliate with a station. But there comes a point where, in my opinion, the cumulative effect is to remove so many that listeners are left with too few choices. And I have always objected to the lack of any local community-based content (EMF, particularly, tends to close the local studios and offices when they acquire a station and just install a dish at the transmitter to receive the national program feed). And from a purely self-serving perspective, fewer stations means fewer potential clients. I don't object to religious programming -- and in fact I give Salem a ton of credit for making a successful business model from it on their stations -- but I keep asking the questions "how many transmitters does God really need" and "shouldn't God be able to communicate without any transmitters at all" and to be honest a lot of the programming I hear on these stations are non-music and should be just as effective on AM, static and all. (Ironically, one market where Relevant is heard on AM is Albuquerque, where they occupy the same frequency that my Eighties Channel first was broadcast on a decade ago.)

But what bothers me most is that it is so out of control now that if God came down in person and said "stop using radio" they still wouldn't stop.
 
If I am selling a station, I go for the highest price. If I have lenders, they will force me to go for it.
While that makes perfect sense, if you're a large conglomerate, and you need to divest a station, you might intentionally choose to sell to an EMF with the knowledge that's one less signal competing for advertising dollars. That has happened, and will (I'm sure) happen again.
 
If I am selling a station, I go for the highest price. If I have lenders, they will force me to go for it.
My aunt recently sold a rental, directly to the person who was living in it instead of going to market where she probably could've go more. But the tenant was always helpful to her and performed all the maintenance on the thing and he saved up for a big down payment. Sales like that don't happen very much, but they do happen.
 
Having been to SF and the wider Bay Area on both times that I've travelled to the US, it does seem a real shame (without getting into the details of which I'm not totally aware of how many / how well SF stations reach into the South Bay area) that a community-minded, fairly wide reaching (despite the only 800 watts or so) country station has been sold to EMF. This reminds me quite a bit of various capital cities here in Australia where Vision Radio (a mixture of K-Love and Christian Preaching talk I guess you could say) have taken the opportunity to take over various low power FM and quite a few high power AM frequencies which have been abandoned over the years. Despite this I feel however that there are still much more choices format-wise in "satellite cities" such as San Jose than there are in the equivalent suburban/outer city/regional markets in Australia. For example, in a regional city over here if you don't like either CHR or totally "safe" classic rock you are pretty much left with only the various ABC (public broadcaster) offerings these days. Oh but Vision FM is everywhere on 87.6 or 88.0 so there's your other choice (not that many people would even know that without searching the bands like us radio nerds/DX'ers do).
 
While that makes perfect sense, if you're a large conglomerate, and you need to divest a station, you might intentionally choose to sell to an EMF with the knowledge that's one less signal competing for advertising dollars. That has happened, and will (I'm sure) happen again.
Except that it more often than not isn't one of the major corporate owners. Except for cases where divestiture of a station has been necessary to stay below ownership caps after a merger (that's how EMF acquired 100.3 in Los Angeles, as an example) it's been smaller owners that sell out. I think the Cumulus sale in 2019 was the last spinoff by one of the big players. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
 
I hate to say this but they actually have three! "Boost" is Christian Hip-hop.
And "K-Love Classics" that they had for awhile on mostly on FM translators and HD channels. A Classic Hits version of Contemp. Christian, with a lot of Amy Grant, Michael W .Smith, etc I think it was replaced by "Boost"

The FCC should have, could have, but too late now, by at least saving the non-comm portion of FM from being by hijacked by anyone. Requiring more than one applicant to grant allocations, including translators based on who would serve the interests of the community best. This would be based on what category of NCE is already available (religious, school student run, underserved ethnic, niche music, activist group) and who would provide what's lacking in that coverage area. It would give even fairness to all types of broadcasters. Preventing at least part of the FM dial from being hijacked.
 
And "K-Love Classics" that they had for awhile on mostly on FM translators and HD channels. A Classic Hits version of Contemp. Christian, with a lot of Amy Grant, Michael W .Smith, etc I think it was replaced by "Boost"

The FCC should have, could have, but too late now, by at least saving the non-comm portion of FM from being by hijacked by anyone. Requiring more than one applicant to grant allocations, including translators based on who would serve the interests of the community best. This would be based on what category of NCE is already available (religious, school student run, underserved ethnic, niche music, activist group) and who would provide what's lacking in that coverage area. It would give even fairness to all types of broadcasters. Preventing at least part of the FM dial from being hijacked.
The FCC ceased to regulate formats when they stopped protecting classical stations nearly 50 years ago. They do regulate and control EEO matters, fairness in political rates and, albeit nebulously, profanity. Other than that , licensees can find the format they wish to have and there is no intervention in the content.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom