KVIC's request is not without merit as to reimbursement; however, at the same time, there is the ~$32K for the transmitter that Henderson disputes..KVIC's filed docs says "The former KVIC transmitter was incapable of producing an ERP of 12.5 KW"...HHHMMM a transmitter does Transmitter Power Out or TPO....NOT ERP...When KVIC was on 95.1, it had a much higher ERP than 12.5 KW so the transmitter must have been doing at least 12.5 KW TPO; add the antenna gain in and, well, there you go! A Harris transmitter can be moved in frequency, so this argument is laughable..However, if the sale does go through, then KVIC can sue in state district court who has jurisdiction in such a matter of this amount and would know that Henderson has the money due to the sale. KVIC should file in state court now requesting allocation of their legal claim of the sale money goes directly to them so Henderson does not get that part at all...However, I think KVIC will lose on the transmitter debate, so there goes 1/3 of the amount right there. Other than that, the FCC has NO control over one licensee not paying another over disputed monetary issues. State (or Federal) courts handle that. Texas State will have exclusive jurisdiction in this scenario; though they may try to pull it into Federal court.....but the payments was not ordered by a Federal Agency...and all transactions took place within the borders of Texas....soooooooooo Texas courts have this case...KVIC just should have waited on 95.1 until Henderson's upgrade was almost done then had the same crew (paid by Henderson) which could have moved KVIC after update KHTZ....seamless to me...and the tower/xmtr company would have had NO problem doing that.