J
Jul
Guest
I would like to get your opinions on the flood coverage on KYW 1060 AM today?
PaulBWalkerJr said:What's wrong with him asking what others thought of the coverage??
We can all see you have your favorites, now if I wrote the original post you would have some smart remark about it, [EDIT].PaulBWalkerJr said:What's wrong with him asking what others thought of the coverage??
PaulBWalkerJr said:Hold up a second jacka**..... if it was a vlaid question about news or weather coverage.. i wouldn't care who wrote it or what stayion.
but if it's a racially biased slamfest, then i care
Why? Be specific. Shawn does have a point. It's like pulling teeth sometimes to get you to really say something beyond these blanket good/bad statements.Julius May said:I think that 1060 did an OK job with the flood coverage.
I didn't listen to it enough for a detailed opinion on KYWfred flintstone said:Why? Be specific. Shawn does have a point. It's like pulling teeth sometimes to get you to really say something beyond these blanket good/bad statements.Julius May said:I think that 1060 did an OK job with the flood coverage.
All right I thought the flood coverage was OK. The station did its job and letting people know what the conditions are in the region, providing traffic and weather reports. KYW is good with some things and this is one of them. KYW is a 50/50 station. Half good with some things, half bad with others like making mistakes with news coverage, errors on news stories, etc.Shawn O'Domski said:Julius: If you didn't listen enough to ascertain an opinion, why bring up this subject in the first place? If you didn't listen enough, why do you even care about KYW's flood coverage? I'm glad to see other people (specifically, Fred/Mike) are beginning to publicly agree with me on the topic of your vague "good station vs. bad station" opinions...with no facts to back up your opinions.
Once again, it's proven that Julius posts just for the sake of posting, and for attention.