• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

L.A. Lakers moving to 710 ESPN!

R

RadioFan99

Guest
After 30 years at KLAC the Los Angeles Lakers are moving to KSPN beginning next season. Mychael Thompson and Spero Dedes will remain on the broadcast which might be a reason Mike was not on the Loose Cannons today. This is not a surprise seeing as it makes perfect sense with the new KSPN studios at L.A. Live and the big investment ESPN/Disney has made at the AEG owned property across from Staples, but still it's sad because we all associate the KLAC call letters with the late great Chick Hearn. What will happen now with Matt "Money" Smith and his association with the broadcasts? Don Martin has done a terrible job at KLAC. The only problem I see is KSPN's weak signal at night.
 
Press release:

The Los Angeles Lakers today announced a new, multi-year radio broadcasting agreement with 710 ESPN beginning in the 2009-10 season.

As the flagship station for the Lakers’ radio coverage, 710 ESPN will carry all 82 regular season and any playoff games, as well as pre- and post-game coverage and preseason games.

“This is an exciting but somewhat bittersweet announcement for the Lakers organization,” said Jeanie Buss, Executive Vice President of Business Operations. “KLAC has been a wonderful partner for more than three decades and we greatly respect and appreciate everything they have done. At the same time, we feel strongly that the time is right for this move to 710 ESPN.”

Buss said the decision was influenced by strength of the ESPN brand and the substantial investment the company has made in the L.A. market. 710 ESPN, for example, plans to broadcast pre- and post-game coverage from the new state-of-the-art ESPN studios at L.A. Live across the street from STAPLES Center.

“It’s hard to imagine two groups better suited to working together than the Lakers and ESPN,” said Jim Pastor, SVP, ESPN Radio Station Group. “The move to L.A. Live and the vast resources of both organizations provide an incredible opportunity to serve Lakers fans for years to come. We couldn’t be prouder to call 710 ESPN their new home.”

The Lakers radio broadcasting team of play-by-play announcer Spero Dedes and color commentator Mychal Thompson will move with the team to the new station.

In addition to game coverage, 710 ESPN will broadcast additional Lakers-themed programming, including hourly team news reports, regular remote broadcasts from Lakers community events and a new weekly Lakers “insider” program. Details of these and other initiatives will be released prior to the commencement of 710 ESPN’s broadcasts next season.

The Lakers’s commitment with the current rights holder, AM 570 KLAC, expires at the end of the 2008-09 season.
 
RadioFan99 said:
The only problem I see is KSPN's weak signal at night.

Absolutely horrible signal coverage in Orange County during the fall and winter nighttime hours. That was a running complaint of OC Angels fans in the past. And during the months Nov-March that's when the most night interference occurs on 710 AM. Too bad, congrats to ESPN 710, they seem to be coming back while KLAC has "peaked" if I can use that word re. ratings :D
 
Attention Lakers management:

Did you look at any nighttime signal patterns, or were you
just so enamored by the ESPN name ("ooooh, ESPN!" ::))
that you didn't consider the 710 signal deficiencies?

KLAC appears to have much better coverage in the outer
San Fernandino Valley areas too.
 
Turn about is fair play. What about the Angels on 830... they want to be known as the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, yet their broadcast cannot be picked up north of the 10 freeway at night. Arte went an entire season without addressing this problem, and it appears it will never be addressed.
 
Lakers gone. Time for KLAC to switch signals with KTLK 1150. Time to see what Progressive Talk can do on a great signal and cover San Diego too. Fox Sports can already be heard in San Diego, so no lost there. Of course they can still carry some sporting events on 570.
 
RBA said:
Lakers gone. Time for KLAC to switch signals with KTLK 1150. Time to see what Progressive Talk can do on a great signal and cover San Diego too. Fox Sports can already be heard in San Diego, so no lost there. Of course they can still carry some sporting events on 570.
Thanks for the laugh. Commercial lib talk will NEVER work in Los Angeles. It barely works anywhere in the nation. Time for Clear Channel to turn out the lights on KTLK and turn it into an infomercial station. At least that would make money. It would probably get better ratings than 1150 gets, too.
 
RBA said:
Time for KLAC to switch signals with KTLK 1150. Time to see what Progressive Talk can do on a great signal and cover San Diego too.

Off topic, but not a bad idea. It does work in Portland, when KPOJ has a more than decent signal. Also remember that CC has usually places ProgTalk on some of thier weaker stations. No one ever said that KTLK would ever overtake KFI. But from some of the posts on this board Stephanie Miller does well in the morning, and in a niche format, it does about as well as it's opposite twin, Salem's KRLA.

But this is about sports and the Lakers....so....

stretched said:
What about the Angels on 830... they want to be known as the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, yet their broadcast cannot be picked up north of the 10 freeway at night. Arte went an entire season without addressing this problem, and it appears it will never be addressed.

Oh but it has. KFWB also broadcasts the Angels games as well.
 
Portland is NOT Los Angeles. Los Angeles is basically a conservative area (certainly the SFV is and OC is undisputed as). Hispanics tend to be more conservative than whites. Portland is a lot more white than Los Angeles. Liberal talk DOESN'T WORK on commercial radio. It would NEVER work on even the KFI signal in Los Angeles. Liberals listen to NPR in this town and that isn't going to change.

Comparing an also-ran joke of a radio station known as KRLA to any other station is ludicrous. Just looking at its website is enough to make me burst out in laughter.

Another off-topic, Kevin James bio shows he is on from 9 to 11 PM but the rotator shows he's on from 9 to Midnight???
 
I agree. Liberal talk will never work in LA. LA/OC/SFV valley is shifting to be more conservative as time passes by. Just look at the ratings of KTLK compared to KFI. Time to laugh? Go ahead. The only reason why KTLK is on the air is for balance between its conservative sister. Just imagine if liberal talk went off the air. People wouldn't be mad that it came off the air because they loved the programming, people would be mad at CC because it makes the talk radio airwaves unbalanced. So if it was between liberal talk or syndicated sports talk...sports talk please!
 
Why won't Liberal (Progressive) Talk work? We live in a nation where they now predominate our National, and in California, Government. If radio ratings were a reflection of the collective political view then Barack Obama would not be in the White House. Yet progressive talk has abysmal ratings any place you care to look. FOX News channel gets ratings that match the combined ratings for CNN and MSNBC on cable. Are we all listening and watching one thing and then voting the opposite?

Then too there are the ratings for sports and sports talk. Go to any market and they are not in the stratosphere of the Arbitrons. Yet they survive while in many markets progressive talk stations have axed the format, often replacing it with sports.

By the way KTLK does not have stellar signal penetration, because they are directional at all times though with 50 KW. KLAC on a low band position with only 5KW and directional only at night gets better area wide penetration. KSPN is 50KW, non directional, days only from a shorter stick (relative to wavelength) so they can not get the coverage of KFI or that of KLAC at night because they tighten the pattern and drop to 10KW at sundown. A limitation unfortunately for AM radio which is being made worse these days by IBOC and other electronic noise. Yet in this market no FMs are taking sports coverage as is happening elsewhere.

Does this mean that we don't listen to games on radio as much? When I was a kid back in Ohio my Dad would have the Reds games on TV with the sound down and listening to Waite Hoyt call the game on the radio.
 
radiojomo said:
I agree. Liberal talk will never work in LA. LA/OC/SFV valley is shifting to be more conservative as time passes by. Just look at the ratings of KTLK compared to KFI. Time to laugh? Go ahead. The only reason why KTLK is on the air is for balance between its conservative sister. Just imagine if liberal talk went off the air. People wouldn't be mad that it came off the air because they loved the programming, people would be mad at CC because it makes the talk radio airwaves unbalanced. So if it was between liberal talk or syndicated sports talk...sports talk please!

This is hardly apples-to-apples. The dynamic between KFI and KTLK is a little more complex than that. Consider KFI's two very strong LOCAL morning and afternoon drive shows (vs. syndication on KTLK), combined with a 15 year head-start with known national talents like Rush and Dr. Laura. KTLK has also had a variety of lineups, a variety of programs from different syndicators, a mediocre signal, regular interruptions for a variety of second-rate sports play-by-play, and on and on. One other note: the ONLY reason why KTLK is on the air is to make money; programming balance is simply the means to the end.
 
nmoore6676 said:
Then too there are the ratings for sports and sports talk. Go to any market and they are not in the stratosphere of the Arbitrons. Yet they survive while in many markets progressive talk stations have axed the format, often replacing it with sports.

WXYT FM in Detroit was #1 in the last book. Sports.

Sports gets very desirable adult male demos, while many AM talkers don't. Even if each gets similar shares, the sports station will be salable while the talker may not be.
 
nmoore6676 said:
Why won't Liberal (Progressive) Talk work? We live in a nation where they now predominate our National, and in California, Government. If radio ratings were a reflection of the collective political view then Barack Obama would not be in the White House. Yet progressive talk has abysmal ratings any place you care to look. FOX News channel gets ratings that match the combined ratings for CNN and MSNBC on cable. Are we all listening and watching one thing and then voting the opposite?

Then too there are the ratings for sports and sports talk. Go to any market and they are not in the stratosphere of the Arbitrons. Yet they survive while in many markets progressive talk stations have axed the format, often replacing it with sports.

By the way KTLK does not have stellar signal penetration, because they are directional at all times though with 50 KW. KLAC on a low band position with only 5KW and directional only at night gets better area wide penetration. KSPN is 50KW, non directional, days only from a shorter stick (relative to wavelength) so they can not get the coverage of KFI or that of KLAC at night because they tighten the pattern and drop to 10KW at sundown. A limitation unfortunately for AM radio which is being made worse these days by IBOC and other electronic noise. Yet in this market no FMs are taking sports coverage as is happening elsewhere.

Does this mean that we don't listen to games on radio as much? When I was a kid back in Ohio my Dad would have the Reds games on TV with the sound down and listening to Waite Hoyt call the game on the radio.
A poll that came out this month confirms most people are conservative, not liberal. http://www.gallup.com/poll/120857/Conservatives-Single-Largest-Ideological-Group.aspx

People wanted a change and the entire economic problems that came down in September killed off any McCain chance. I'm a life-long Reagan Republican but I didn't even vote for that RINO McCain. I certainly didn't vote for Obama either.

Look at the election results for the recent propositions to add to our taxes. The only counties that get close to 50% yes on Prop 1A, the most important prop, were in the San Francisco area http://vote.sos.ca.gov/returns/props/map1A.htm It was totally killed in Southern California. Look at Prop 8. Even with Obama winning, EVERY Southern California County, except Santa Barbara, voted Yes to ban gay marriage. Look at Northern California on this map of the election results http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-2008election-prop8prop22,0,6153805.htmlstory This is more evidence of the more conservative nature of Southern California vs. Northern California.

KFI, easily described, has moved over the last few years to being independent populist. It's not really conservative, sans Rush Limbaugh, or liberal. If any of its idiotic competitors had a brain, they could easily take advantage of this if they had any compelling local programming. Looks like KFI will be doing quite well for ages...

Ultra-liberal MSNBC's ratings are down considerably since the election, especially in the Los Angeles market. Fox News on some days outrates the combined ratings of CNN, MSNBC, HLN and CNBC combined.

Once again, liberal talk on commercial radio will never work in Los Angeles. Many of my friends are liberal and they always quote me something from NPR. Like I care...
 
Shoot From Hip said:
radiojomo said:
I agree. Liberal talk will never work in LA. LA/OC/SFV valley is shifting to be more conservative as time passes by. Just look at the ratings of KTLK compared to KFI. Time to laugh? Go ahead. The only reason why KTLK is on the air is for balance between its conservative sister. Just imagine if liberal talk went off the air. People wouldn't be mad that it came off the air because they loved the programming, people would be mad at CC because it makes the talk radio airwaves unbalanced. So if it was between liberal talk or syndicated sports talk...sports talk please!

This is hardly apples-to-apples. The dynamic between KFI and KTLK is a little more complex than that. Consider KFI's two very strong LOCAL morning and afternoon drive shows (vs. syndication on KTLK), combined with a 15 year head-start with known national talents like Rush and Dr. Laura. KTLK has also had a variety of lineups, a variety of programs from different syndicators, a mediocre signal, regular interruptions for a variety of second-rate sports play-by-play, and on and on. One other note: the ONLY reason why KTLK is on the air is to make money; programming balance is simply the means to the end.
KTLK doesn't bill cr*p on its own. It ends up being a bonus for buying KFI.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom