David needs to beat up the L.A. Times. In their review of the Fall book, they incorrectly listed KRCD and not the KRCD/KRCV - showing the station with just the KRCD number ... This is why the mainstream media needs to get someone who has a clue about our business to write these columns. Making a mistake about the No. 6 25-54 station in L.A. is a disgrace.
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
L.A. Times Ratings Review Error
- Thread starter radioresearcher
- Start date
> David needs to beat up the L.A. Times. In their review of
> the Fall book, they incorrectly listed KRCD and not the
> KRCD/KRCV - showing the station with just the KRCD number
> ... This is why the mainstream media needs to get someone
> who has a clue about our business to write these columns.
> Making a mistake about the No. 6 25-54 station in L.A. is a
> disgrace.
Thank you. Just fired off an e mail. However, the LA Times is one of my least-favorite papers, so I expect very little.
>
> the Fall book, they incorrectly listed KRCD and not the
> KRCD/KRCV - showing the station with just the KRCD number
> ... This is why the mainstream media needs to get someone
> who has a clue about our business to write these columns.
> Making a mistake about the No. 6 25-54 station in L.A. is a
> disgrace.
Thank you. Just fired off an e mail. However, the LA Times is one of my least-favorite papers, so I expect very little.
>
K
Kyle_Hojem
Guest
I'm not a fan of the LA Times either. I like the OC Register better, plus they've got Gary Lycan in Sunday's edition for radio news.
> Thank you. Just fired off an e mail. However, the LA Times
> is one of my least-favorite papers, so I expect very little.<P ID="signature">______________
Member of the Los Angeles, Phoenix Radio, and California TV moderation team</P>
> Thank you. Just fired off an e mail. However, the LA Times
> is one of my least-favorite papers, so I expect very little.<P ID="signature">______________
Member of the Los Angeles, Phoenix Radio, and California TV moderation team</P>
I've found over the years, that if I was personally involved
in something that got newspaper coverage (radio or other), there
was always a major, fundamental error in the story.
Corrections (if any) were usually in a small box near the classifieds! LOL <P ID="signature">______________
but wait...there's more!</P>
in something that got newspaper coverage (radio or other), there
was always a major, fundamental error in the story.
Corrections (if any) were usually in a small box near the classifieds! LOL <P ID="signature">______________
but wait...there's more!</P>
R
rwagoner
Guest
> I've found over the years, that if I was personally involved
>
> in something that got newspaper coverage (radio or other),
> there
> was always a major, fundamental error in the story.
> Corrections (if any) were usually in a small box near the
> classifieds! LOL
>
Granted I'm not in one of the majors, but if an error ever appears in my Torrance/South Bay Daily Breeze column, I try to highlight the correction as soon as I find out about it. For one, it makes the next week's column even easier to write ...
Richard Wagoner
>
> in something that got newspaper coverage (radio or other),
> there
> was always a major, fundamental error in the story.
> Corrections (if any) were usually in a small box near the
> classifieds! LOL
>
Granted I'm not in one of the majors, but if an error ever appears in my Torrance/South Bay Daily Breeze column, I try to highlight the correction as soon as I find out about it. For one, it makes the next week's column even easier to write ...
Richard Wagoner
- Status