oaktree said:
Sounds like yet another talk about the validity of ratings, such as 6+ or 12+ is needed, David.
Oldies76 and his sock puppet Scootie don't understand, no matter how many times it is stated, that the 12+ and 6+ have no meaning to station management, sellers or programmers. And that is why Arbitron gives them away for free.
Of course, he does not want to understand, and persists in trying to find the deep and hidden meaning in 12+.
Now, all go, "uuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmhhhhhh."
One can "extrapolate" all it wants from these beauty contest numbers, but they, essentially, mean nothing in the overall scheme of things.
And trying to explain that variations of a few tenths of a share point are within the margin of error of the methodology, and thus meaningless. Or how in previous summers the panel changes more in the summer, making tracking less reliable.
Or that the average number of meters detecting a particular popular station at any time is less than 20.