jfrancispastirchak said:
landtuna said:
I know of no one in their 40's (or later) who watch Welk or listen to rap, Pink or Gaga.
I do. But, putting it in perspective, the appeal for me is rooted in the Welk-"effect" I mentioned here much earlier (surprised this thread re-emerged), as opposed to the quality of the music and the routines they did, which I sometimes found to be campy & schmaltzy. It certainly was not a sophisticated show. Welk simply brings me back to a much more comfortable time. For an hour or so, I feel safe again.
I'm 48, and I've been to the champagne dark side. It ain't all that bad, once you get used to it. :-D
Seriously, over the last 5-10 years I've come to appreciate Lawrence Welk -- camp, schmaltz, warts and all -- and what he brought to music, and to television. I have copies of a couple dozen early Welk B/W kinescopes, and enjoy watching those every now and again, along with the PBS repeats (which I can get on South Carolina ETV).
I truly love what you said, jfrancis --
"for an hour or so, I feel safe again." Both my grandparents loved Welk in their day, and for them it was appointment television. When Lawrence Welk is on my television, I feel their spirit in the room with me. And I like that. A lot.
The earlier shows, to my way of seeing it, had more fizz in the champagne. Even right up to the end of Welk's ABC run, there was still a network to answer to ... a nudge, however light or infrequent, of keeping the show toward the younger end of its "65-to-deceased" target demographic. But once LW became his own boss on the syndie circuit, there was no longer the checks and balances of ABC. The show then seemed to dig in its geriatric heels, and taking on a looks of a "you-damn-kids-get-off-my-lawn" production.
This person in his 40s would sooner take a Lawrence Welk marathon over the horse dung that passes for 90% of today's television. Take that, with a swig of Geritol for a chaser. Oh, and get off MY lawn...... ;D ;D
--Russell