It is standard practice for one traffic reporter to present reports on many stations. The only argument seems to be about doing it live or recorded. Why does it have to be live? Traffic conditions do not change significantly in 5, 10, or even 20 minutes. Even if an accident is cleared the legacy traffic jam remains for a long time. So, time is not of the essence here.
Medford, Oregon's Mapleton and Opus radio clusters sometimes spreads its air talent over three
stations in their respective clusters. What's stopping major market clusters from doing the same?
Unions, where workers haven't voted to dissolve them.
And how would one rate listener loyalty now? With the constant change in personnel and formats,
I believe that listener loyalty is nowhere near what it was, and never will be...which will likely encourage
the cheapening mentality that Newsperson succintly pointed out: "Congratulations, Metro, on figuring
out how to be the cheapest of the cheap!"
I don't recall that listeners are especially loyal to traffic reporters, and that's what's being talked about here.
Your only argument is with whether it's live or recorded. It's not with the fact that Metro uses the same talent to do multiple reports because this has gone on for well over a decade. Clue: KGO's Joe Vincent is KQED's Joe McConnell. According to one of his bios: "Over the years, Joe has reported traffic or news on several radio stations in the Bay Area, including KGO, KBLX, KQED, KABL, KTCT, KFOG, KSAN, KNEW, KSFO, KYA, KFRC, KBAY, K101, KSOL, and KVON/KVYN in the Napa Valley"
I'm not sure what his schedule is currently, except for KGO and KQED but he's always been in multiple places, just not all at once. The other Metro traffic people, the same.