PTBoardOp94 said:landtuna said:The "hipness" of an auto brand is just possibly the most useless and worst measure of how to value a purchase - even if you could quantify it. The days when the brand of car you drive determines your self-worth are long gone. It does seem certain people try to fill out their self-worth suits with brand names but the most that accomplishes is telling others how frivolous and insecure you are.
While there are good reasons for buying certain expensive and unique cars trying to impress others is not one of them.
Car buying is hard. Is a 2013 Audi going to be more reliable than a 2013 Lexus? More fun to drive? Better radio? Measuring hipness is easy by comparison because it is a personal judgment - and advertisers can influence personal judgments.
An Audi more reliable than a Toyota product? Not a chance. Call Toyota stodgy if you want, but their cars are basically bullet-proof. I know - I've owned a few...though never a Lexus.
When people buy cars for status, they're not as concerned with reliability. If that were the case, nobody would ever buy a Range Rover or a Jaguar.
I'm sure "hipness" is influenced by advertising. Those old enough to remember Rambler know why that car company went out of business - their cars were reliable and practical, but they were pegged as a stodgy "grandma" car, so people didn't like them. By the time American Motors sold out to Chrysler, their only popular product was Jeep, which WAS considered hip in the 80s.
In the mid 70s, I bought a used 67 Rambler Classic 770 station wagon. It was as ugly as s**t, but it was a good car - it had a big V8, and it was FAST, too.