ShawnHill1 said:therealjm12 said:Part of the reason why we don't see some of the classic shows we'd like to see is because of "bundling" by the syndicators. Let's use Barny Miller for example: if a TV station or cable channel wants to buy it they may forced to acquire other shows with it. In Barney's case it's Columbia (Sony) so they may be forced to buy The Love Boat or Charlies Angels. Twos show they may not want or have room for. Now that's the way it used to be. Maybe with all the outlets things have changed.
Points taken, although in the case of The Love Boat and Charlie's Angels, those shows are under CBS ownership (in fact, the whole Aaron Spelling library is under CBS ownership, as it inheirted the library after the restructing of CBS and Viacom). I actually always though that Fox owned the rights to the those shows, since many of the 70s/80s Spelling shows were filmed at 20th Century Fox; Metromedia, before its absortion into Fox, had the distibution rights to Dynasty (another show we can add to the list, since SoapNet dropped the rights a few years ago). Dynasty, much like its rival Dallas, didn't do so well in off-network reruns, as did another nighttime serial from that era: Falcon Crest.
Now that I think about of it...I can't think of any Aaron Spelling series that lasted as long and well in syndication, maybe outside of maybe Charlie's Angels (currently airing on Universal HD) and The Love Boat. They tend to do well more on cable than broadcast TV for whatever reason.
Has any hour long drama done well in syndication? Sitcoms do better because you can watch those any random day but dramas have to be watched every day to keep up with the plots. You can also air sitcoms out of episode order and no one will care.