In what sense?What happened at Lotus
Oh I hadn't heard. It's that time of the season you know...Staff this week
I've been checking around and haven't heard or seen anything related to Lotus. Usually someone sneaks a memo online if something was up.OK, so what actually happened? Just Seattle, or other markets as well?
As I recall, there was some sort of reciprocal content agreement as part of the sale from Sinclair. Could be that AM-1000 will just repurpose audio from KOMO-TV stories? We will see. Or, hear.Really unfortunate news. I haven't followed super closely, but I believe the KNWN news operations were fully separated from KOMO-TV at this point? I imagine that shared resources across KOMO-AM/TV would have made the AM 1000 format more viable from a cost standpoint. Were/are they still doing any sort of partnering with KOMO TV?
Uh-huh....Doesn't matter. I'm now inoculated from the rapidly spreading virus that is Jackindabox.
I'm not sure how one does 'all news' without reporters, but I guess we'll see soon.
Could be that AM-1000 will just repurpose audio from KOMO-TV stories? We will see. Or, hear.
I think twelve FT reporters was a lot in number, but Lotus might be throwing out the content baby with the bathwater by cutting them all. Just my opinion of course, nor am I privy to their financials which no doubt has more backup for the decision.What a lot of stations do is collate various news sources (the local paper, other news radio, and the internet) to cover local stories without sending their own physical reporters to sites. It's been done since the 90s. As long as the station has anchors, they can present the news.
And news is the most expensive format of all.As I said earlier in this thread, everyone has been hit hard by a drop in advertising. Some have deeper pockets than others.
Right. A station I worked at in the early '90s had a small but respectable news staff and they were inevitably cut. About a year later after listeners continuously complained about the lack of local news, their solution was to work out a deal with one of the TV stations in that market where the AM station in that radio cluster would carry their 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. newscasts from beginning to end, including commercials. They worked it out financially between the radio and TV station involved, and the TV station used it as a feather in their cap to sell additional advertising or charge higher rates since clients' spots were not only seen/heard by their TV audience, but now by a "captive" radio audience as well! The GM and sales folks were thrilled. Those who cared about the quality and content of the on-air product were mortified. Basically they had a small black and white TV in the radio studio that the staff would tune to that TV station to get the news, and they used the 1/8" headphone jack to from the TV to deliver the audio to the console. Back in the analog TV days it wasn't uncommon to get buzzing or high pitched noise as they'd switch from one camera shot to another and all that was going out over the air. News stories and even commercials that relied heavily on the visuals that were seen by the TV audience were lost on radio. I think it lasted a bit more than 6 months before they finally came to their senses and killed the idea.Other news radio stations with content agreements from the local TV station have tried this before, but discovered just audio from a TV story doesn't always translate properly to a radio audience. And somehow I doubt the news folks at KOMO-TV now that KOMO radio is gone are interested in catering their stories for an audio-only platform, especially when they don't have to. Running local story audio from TV will likely sound clunky.
Lotus might be throwing out the content baby with the bathwater by cutting them all.