Around 1970, I picked up 10 watt WBWC 88.3 near Cleveland (Elyria??) in Cincinnati. But that pales in comparison to another DXer in Cincy who heard a 10 watter from one of the Dakotas on skip around the same era.Nick said:What's the furthest you got a station less than 100 watts (and less than 50 feet HAAT)?
I just received a 10 watt station from about 20 feet above ground level 25 miles away in the car.
Nick said:What's the furthest you got a station less than 100 watts (and less than 50 feet HAAT)?
I just received a 10 watt station from about 20 feet above ground level 25 miles away in the car.
Grrrradio said:A sudden random notion that struck me -- how severely does receiver desensing (due to signal overload) affect DXability of low-power signals? In other words, all other things being equal (terrain, HAAT, power level, openness of its OWN frequency and first adjacents, receiver specs), how much further would a LPFM in the flat part of eastern Colorado be usefully detectable than a counterpart in NYC, Kansas City, Des Moines, or even Grand Island, as you go down the scale of saturation?
vibe said:Just curious, are there many stations on that frequency?
88.2 is used right across NZ for LPFM where no license is required (yes that's right!!). Just a couple of years ago, that 0.3 watt limit was increased to 1 watt.
NZ reserved two parts of the FM band for this - "88.0 - 89.0" & "107.0 - 108.0".
dxer2_2000