• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

LUKE LEAVING KIRO MIDDAY SLOT

Surprised there is no discussion of Luke Burbank announcing his departure from KIRO-FM midday talk slot??

(As a sidebar...I would expect to see this on BlatherWatch, but last post is April 24. Did Mike throw in the towel when he lost his partner?)
 
LITTLEBOYBLUE said:
Surprised there is no discussion of Luke Burbank announcing his departure from KIRO-FM midday talk slot??

Doesn't surprise me. If it ain't about "Kokomo", DXing or corporate radio bashing it gets no traction here...(sorry, couldn't resist... ;D).

Maybe Luke doesn't want to wait until Dave Ross is kicked out of 1820 Eastlake so he can get the entire midday show.
 
That outta be bad for ratings.. Dori Monson afternoons are practically unbearable, and the Ron and Don Show bores me stiff.

The latest ratings show KIRO-FM is struggling.. Perhaps that is why they have changed station policy to once again allow these talk show hosts to accept actual callers?
 
fordranger797 said:
That outta be bad for ratings.. Dori Monson afternoons are practically unbearable, and the Ron and Don Show bores me stiff.

The latest ratings show KIRO-FM is struggling.. Perhaps that is why they have changed station policy to once again allow these talk show hosts to accept actual callers?

I just love when people who have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about comment on how ratings will be affected. Let’s edumacate you and the other Dori haters…he’s the only constant performer on that station! Now for the Luke lovers…he’s never done well in the ratings!

Looking at May in a demo that should be a KIRO wheelhouse (Men 35-64), Burbank’s 9-12n daypart is ranked 12th in share. Beating him is the friggin Christian station….in MEN 35-64.

Same book, Dori isn’t doing as well as he had in the past, but his rating is 50% higher than Burbank and he’s sitting at 7th. KIRO has its issues for sure, but Dori isn’t one of them.

Now, prediction…who will be taking over that daypart? Either Ross moves back OR, my money is on Ken Schram.
 
I never liked Luke on the radio. Self-serving and way too snarky for my taste. But I notice those qualities on other 30-something Seattle-ites. Being a baby-boomer, I don't get along with them. They know sh_t. The problem with that generation is they don't take orders very well. Do it because I told you to and don't question my integrity or experience.

Good-riddence.
 
LITTLEBOYBLUE said:
Surprised there is no discussion of Luke Burbank announcing his departure from KIRO-FM midday talk slot??

(As a sidebar...I would expect to see this on BlatherWatch, but last post is April 24. Did Mike throw in the towel when he lost his partner?)
BW AFAIK is done, I filled in the last year doing stories, but MH said he was done with it last year. It wasn't renewed and hoped to do a send off before the website renewal period but it never happened.
Luke was fishing for another gig while at KIRO while his website saw a lot of traffic. Ken Schram was considered part of the dark void in Seattle radio/TV, I doubt he'll be picked up.

As someone noted "It’s ironic that one of Schram’s last quotes was "There's a void in intelligent journalism," I’ve always thought that he helped create that void." The same source also asked, "An interesting question to explore might be did the death of substantive local TV news ultimately lead to right-wing talk radio. The slide into “he said, she said” journalism scribes meant the end of standards that might have kept talk radio in check."
 
Blatherwatch said:
As someone noted "It’s ironic that one of Schram’s last quotes was "There's a void in intelligent journalism," I’ve always thought that he helped create that void." The same source also asked, "An interesting question to explore might be did the death of substantive local TV news ultimately lead to right-wing talk radio. The slide into “he said, she said” journalism scribes meant the end of standards that might have kept talk radio in check."

Probably components. My take on history is going to be to hang it on FCC! They didn't adopt technical standards for AM...so FM better location for music and one-by-one music formats abandoned AM. Spoken word basically only technical format of choice ... and that led to Rush merging his knowledge of Top-40-driven "hype" with a need to do a format that wasn't music based (Stern doing his thing at same time). Then, again with the FCC, ongoing crumbling of mandates to be "fair", mandates to cover "local", mandates to have "news" or "public affairs" ... and you're left with the product that's on the AM band now. The same expectation of lowest-common-denominator (coupled with Attention Deficit by audience) led to the TV news product changing to be about "give us 5 minutes and we'll give you a spoonful". Even decent shows like Rock Center aren't getting any traction, and aren't given much support by the network. For that matter...even PBS has followed the network models of "go with the guy who gives you the hits"; but instead of Jerry Bruckheimer having 20 flavors of CSI ... they have TJ Lubinsky giving them 20 flavors of "My Music", all with built-in pledge breaks.

And now...we have an opportunity for new technical standards for digital radio....and FCC once again sitting it out. Right now, they're too busy about how to write rules covering people who drop F-bombs.
 
Luke is talented but radio was really not his forum, or KIRO-FM was not. His show at night did not rate and when in mid-days the station died. Luke most likely got out on his own, knowing the future was not bright and his talent may be best used in podcasts and other forms of non-radio talk and comment.

Something is up with News, Sports and Talk radio right now in Seattle. All stations, outside of KUOW mornings are in trouble. I thought first it might be meter placement, but this decline has lasted for a good year now. It is not the same in other markets with stations like WTOP, KCBS and others doing very well. Is Seattle so NPR centric that there is not room for commercial talk or news? Is Seattle so tech savvy that younger listeners are moving to the internet for news, traffic and information. Is the programming to old and not compelling? I suspect it is a combination of all these factors.
 
There's often a real lack of substance in local "news" and "talk," from what I'm looking for. Hey KIRO, how about some guests once in awhile, instead of just hosts giving us their unsolicited opinions about everything?
I rather enjoy the Dave Ross-Luke Burbank banter. Has a genuine vibe to it, unlike the hyped and over-processed attempts at duets in the rest of KIRO-FM's schedule. And they do touch on things that are current each day, without evangelizing me as to how to process everything in the world. I'll miss them. And I don't think there's much of anything else I'll be running to instead. Pity.

KUOW seems to have gone to much shorter, attention-deficit material, so that you're sure to find something you don't want to listen to in 20 minutes or less. I don't need to hear the name of the board op and legal IDs every few minutes. It's like putting up fences in an open field I was hoping to explore for awhile. Or waitresses who whisk away your table setting before you're really finished.

KOMO is sort of an 'all news' station now, but the journalistic instincts of some of their presenters and their ability to ad lib during breaking news really varies. The TV reports really do need a re-do for radio. Compare their presentation and hourly clock with other all-news outlets that dominate their markets (like KCBS) and you'll hear how it's a lot of little things that add up. Heck, even compare them to CKWX News 1130 from Vancouver, which does OK as an AM to our north, and you'll hear more frequent updates, a broader range of material, less repetition, more compelling traffic reports, and shorter commercial breaks, that makes them a little easier on the ears, and appear a bit more energetic (tho' their frequent mini-reports from ABC in New York are usually lame, in my opinion).

I don't think I'm alone in wanting to be drawn into discussions that make me want to hear more, and that make me sometimes lose track of the time because it's so interesting, from honest people who are not offering rehearsed political zingers, or that sound like Mr. Big is looking over their shoulder.

When I hear relaxed, confident, and interesting hosts from before my time on retro cable TV stations, or on PBS fundraiser specials, I can tell that the Jack Paars, Steve Allens, and even Jack Bennys or Grouchos of decades past have few, if any, counterparts today on the radio who know how to communicate thru a microphone in a comparably compelling manner. OK, Dave Ross is in their league. And Bill Radke would be, if allowed to do his thing. But that's about it for Seattle, as far as I'm concerned. Unless you're into "jocks."
 
KIRO-FM is doing these really long, (sometimes 8-minutes) stop-sets.

I glance at the clock in my car. What?! 8 minutes to the top of the hour? Do they really think I'm going to stay tuned for this?

Also, those long stop-sets sometimes run over and they miss hitting the top-of-the-hour news, simply fading it up late. That's f--cked up.

Sounds like radio in Oskaloosa, Iowa. Yes, I been there.
 
LITTLEBOYBLUE said:
Blatherwatch said:
As someone noted "It’s ironic that one of Schram’s last quotes was "There's a void in intelligent journalism," I’ve always thought that he helped create that void." The same source also asked, "An interesting question to explore might be did the death of substantive local TV news ultimately lead to right-wing talk radio. The slide into “he said, she said” journalism scribes meant the end of standards that might have kept talk radio in check."
Right now, they're (the FCC) too busy about how to write rules covering people who drop F-bombs.

FCC those FCCing motherFCCers......
 
Time for KIRO to hang up News/Talk. It has "failed". Look at the struggling ratings. A revival of KBSG would do better than this.

-crainbebo
 
crainbebo said:
Time for KIRO to hang up News/Talk. It has "failed". Look at the struggling ratings. A revival of KBSG would do better than this.

-crainbebo

Sure, hang up the format on a top-5 billing station. Put KBSG back on and watch it sink to a top-15 biller.

Ratings are the least of the numbers stations worry about. Like any business - follow the money to find what REALLY matters.
 
Did everyone see this link? Burbank's baby-mama gives her side of the story. If what she says is the truth...ugh.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57454757/a-dads-take-on-teen-fatherhood/

He talks about the stuggles of being a teenage dad, but, in the comments, the baby-mama says Luke has be a very absent father.

Reader Beware....Mr. Burbank is prone to embellishment.

I am the mother of the child that Mr. Burbank is speaking of and not only do I, like many others who have commented, disagree with Mr. Burbank's position and opinions I would like to set the record straight with regards to his self-report of his involvement level and touted position as a "TEENAGE FATHER". First, Mr. Burbank and I have known each other since the 7th grade and I did not get pregnant after junior prom. He states himself we were not romantically involved - so how in the world would we have suddenly "co-parented" to raise a child. Mr. Burbank was half way through his senior year in high school when our daughter was born and after high school he continued onto college. I am confused as to when it was exactly he claims he was a "father" to our daughter in those early years...he didn't live near her and was barely present in her young developmental years. He only saw her 2 times the first week after she was born and then not again until she was 16 months old!

He tells the truth when he admits that his parents did not financially assist us; but such is not true of my own parents who provided much more then "moral support". They provided me and our daughter with a place to live, clothing, food, medical care and other substantial and much needed financial assistance, "much needed" because Mr. Burbank refused to pay a dime of child support for the first 7 years of our daughter's life.

Because I felt it was important that our daughter have a relationship with her father she has always had access to him, despite the fact that he was often off flittering around the country chasing one career endeavor or another. One glance at Mr. Burbank's resume would advise anyone that it was impossible for him to have been involved on any meaningful or consistent level in our daughter's life as he, for most of her life, did not live in the area.

When our daughter was 7, I married and it is our daughter's step-father that deserves the praise. He is the one that has provided for her day to day needs, help to educate her in a private school, and got Mr. Burbank on the phone and demanded that he start contributing towards our daughter's financial needs. Even then, Mr. Burbank lied to us about his income convincing us to believe that he was barely squeaking by in life and that he could only pay a pittance in support. I recently learned that Mr. Burbank has earned well into the 6 digits for several years. His support should have been 3 to 4 times what he offered to pay. He has not paid medical expenses, daycare or extracurricular activity expenses incurred through out our daughter's life. This matter is currently being taken up in Court.

The only truth in Mr. Burbank's commentary is that our daughter is AMAZING. She is headed to college...the cost of which is also a matter currently before the Court as Mr. Burbank does not believe he should be responsible for paying that expense either.

The truth of the matter is that Mr. Burbank lives in fantasy land, filled with delusions of self-importance. This commentary is laughable. He has no experience as a teenage "father". He was a ***** teenage boy and I was an impressionable teenage girl looking for his attention. He took advantage of me...and left. Mr. Burbank is a weekend Disneyland Dad whom I have had to continually struggle with to help financially support his daughter. He should be ashamed of himself.
 
tellemhawk said:
Did everyone see this link? Burbank's baby-mama gives her side of the story. If what she says is the truth...ugh.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57454757/a-dads-take-on-teen-fatherhood/

He talks about the stuggles of being a teenage dad, but, in the comments, the baby-mama says Luke has be a very absent father.

Reader Beware....Mr. Burbank is prone to embellishment.

I am the mother of the child that Mr. Burbank is speaking of and not only do I, like many others who have commented, disagree with Mr. Burbank's position and opinions I would like to set the record straight with regards to his self-report of his involvement level and touted position as a "TEENAGE FATHER". First, Mr. Burbank and I have known each other since the 7th grade and I did not get pregnant after junior prom. He states himself we were not romantically involved - so how in the world would we have suddenly "co-parented" to raise a child. Mr. Burbank was half way through his senior year in high school when our daughter was born and after high school he continued onto college. I am confused as to when it was exactly he claims he was a "father" to our daughter in those early years...he didn't live near her and was barely present in her young developmental years. He only saw her 2 times the first week after she was born and then not again until she was 16 months old!

He tells the truth when he admits that his parents did not financially assist us; but such is not true of my own parents who provided much more then "moral support". They provided me and our daughter with a place to live, clothing, food, medical care and other substantial and much needed financial assistance, "much needed" because Mr. Burbank refused to pay a dime of child support for the first 7 years of our daughter's life.

Because I felt it was important that our daughter have a relationship with her father she has always had access to him, despite the fact that he was often off flittering around the country chasing one career endeavor or another. One glance at Mr. Burbank's resume would advise anyone that it was impossible for him to have been involved on any meaningful or consistent level in our daughter's life as he, for most of her life, did not live in the area.

When our daughter was 7, I married and it is our daughter's step-father that deserves the praise. He is the one that has provided for her day to day needs, help to educate her in a private school, and got Mr. Burbank on the phone and demanded that he start contributing towards our daughter's financial needs. Even then, Mr. Burbank lied to us about his income convincing us to believe that he was barely squeaking by in life and that he could only pay a pittance in support. I recently learned that Mr. Burbank has earned well into the 6 digits for several years. His support should have been 3 to 4 times what he offered to pay. He has not paid medical expenses, daycare or extracurricular activity expenses incurred through out our daughter's life. This matter is currently being taken up in Court.

The only truth in Mr. Burbank's commentary is that our daughter is AMAZING. She is headed to college...the cost of which is also a matter currently before the Court as Mr. Burbank does not believe he should be responsible for paying that expense either.

The truth of the matter is that Mr. Burbank lives in fantasy land, filled with delusions of self-importance. This commentary is laughable. He has no experience as a teenage "father". He was a ***** teenage boy and I was an impressionable teenage girl looking for his attention. He took advantage of me...and left. Mr. Burbank is a weekend Disneyland Dad whom I have had to continually struggle with to help financially support his daughter. He should be ashamed of himself.

WHOA.....
 
OK girls - whatever the nature of the relationship between Luke and the mother of his daughter, it seems like someone is hoping to take a few cheap shots here. Their interpersonal difficulties are really not my business, and I hope none of you take any pleasure in getting into it either. Regardless of the level of mistakes, and how long they persist, this sounds like a personal issue that shoudln't be up for public debate, the likes of "well, if it were up to ME..." That's just catty gossip. And if you aren't a bit too much of a self-promoter, you probably woudln't get many gigs in commercial radio. I'm not making excuses for Mr. Burbank, but I'm dismayed at the level of meanness that this part of the thread seems to be drifting into.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom