An example of this took place during the morning news on Fox Phoenix this morning but it is probably common elsewhere as well.
Why do the news people think it is important or interesting for viewers to be read a list of tweets by miscellaneous people commenting on stories? For example, this morning, after covering the Colorado theater shootings in great detail one of the anchors spent quite a bit of time reading tweets off her monitor and then went to Facebook and read even more.
This is a waste of air time and does not add anything of value to the story. So why do they do it?
It is akin to asking bystanders at a house fire how they feel when their neighbor's house burns to the ground.
Why do the news people think it is important or interesting for viewers to be read a list of tweets by miscellaneous people commenting on stories? For example, this morning, after covering the Colorado theater shootings in great detail one of the anchors spent quite a bit of time reading tweets off her monitor and then went to Facebook and read even more.
This is a waste of air time and does not add anything of value to the story. So why do they do it?
It is akin to asking bystanders at a house fire how they feel when their neighbor's house burns to the ground.