Better source with more accurate format descriptors and more prior months:Here are the March 2024 San Francisco Radio PPM Ratings:
And the March 2024 San Jose Radio PPM Ratings:
Any thoughts or observations?
radioinsight.com
Funny that you brought up Atlanta. Both Power and The Beat swapped places today (April 16, 2024).Power in Atlanta, Q102 in Philly and Wild in S.F. are getting smoked by the competition. It's embarrassing how poorly these stations are performing. For years and years, it was uncommon for iHM to have a poorly performing CHR station in a major PPM market.
This isn't just a "format" problem, either. CHR has plenty of AQH listeners in the Bay Area; most of those ears are landing at 99.7.
I wondered about this in October, and someone else said KQED doesn't buy the embedded market San Jose book, so they don't show up in its ratings.Any idea why KQED isn't listed in the San Jose ratings this month???
The San Jose book is mostly a sales tool; KQED is not commercial.I wondered about this in October, and someone else said KQED doesn't buy the embedded market San Jose book, so they don't show up in its ratings.
KQED pumps out 110,000 watts (110Kw) from Mount San Bruno. They cover the Bay Area and beyond (including a big swath of the Sierra foothills) like a blanket. And as David wrote, they're not really competing for ad dollars. (Though "underwriting" isn't massively different.) So the full market book gives them, and current and potential underwriters, all the data they need. The "Silicon Valley" book is superfluous.The San Jose book is mostly a sales tool; KQED is not commercial.
In the San Francisco book you can break out numbers by counties and areas. For programming, they get all they need.
And subscribers to the full SF book can extract any county they want. The embedded book is intended for limited signal stations to have a cheaper way of getting ratings just for their area.KQED pumps out 110,000 watts (110Kw) from Mount San Bruno. They cover the Bay Area and beyond (including a big swath of the Sierra foothills) like a blanket. And as David wrote, they're not really competing for ad dollars. (Though "underwriting" isn't massively different.) So the full market book gives them, and current and potential underwriters, all the data they need. The "Silicon Valley" book is superfluous.
KQED is regularly at or near the top of the San Jose non-public data.KQED doesn't buy the embedded market San Jose book, so they don't show up in its ratings.