I find it annoying how Mark claims all the time that he is being ripped off by the other hosts. He's worse than Howard Stern is when it comes to this. That is not how to do a good radio show, when he pauses after his comments, and reminds the audience that the preceding comments have or will be picked up by other hosts. I don't find him to be that unique. If something is in the news, there's a good chance that more than one person is going to have the same commentary or reaction to it. I don't automatically assume that one person has ripped off another if they say something on radio that another host has said. What constitutes a ripoff in radio? I understand that ripoffs occur, and it is fine to point them out, but most of the things that Mark cites are too generic.