• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Massive CC Layoffs Next Week!

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123214134302591501-lMyQjAxMDI5MzEyNjExNDYxWj.html

Here ... try this on for size and see if you can, maybe, understand what's been said here for, now, two weeks.

From the Wall Street Journal:

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123214134302591501-lMyQjAxMDI5MzEyNjExNDYxWj.html

Guys, it's been two weeks since we've discussed this. The larger portion of the cuts, be they 1000 or 1500, whether they come from billboards, traffic, continuity, promotion, board ops, news, on air or managment isn't the point. The point is SALES and the most cuts will be from SALES ... and those who DON'T pay for or meet the Clear Channel 50% profit margin model

Now, after that ... they slice and dice and say, "OK, if the revenue affect paying for that board op, then the board op goes. If the profit margin can't still be met, then, cut the producer. Then cut the next board op. Cut the nite jock, we're moving syndication there, since nite isn't obviously being sold anyway after 7p.m.

Then, when they see that they are making their 50% with or without you ... they move (or have done so as of last Tuesday) with the next station in the cluster, then the next cluster until they have brought the magic number in line.

It's not about surviving board ops because of the salary they cost Clear Channel and their "low wages." It's about how much each daypart has value vs. the expense - minus 50 percent profit. It's that simple.

Clear Channel ... and soon others ... will or could care less about producer, board op, production, promotion, blah blah blah. they have to care about stockholders and the bottom line. Why? Because they screwed the pooch when they bought so many of these pitiful stations already overpriced, and now are stuck with them in a horrible economy ... with advertisers who have bailed from a medium that they, too, don't believe in when money is tight.

It's about REVENUE ... not how important or unimportant you are. REVENUE ... you know, the paycheck that pays your salary ... while, still, making them 50% AFTER they pay you. That's what's important the them.

That's ... business. And that's what's going on in radio today. If it comes down to talent and it doesn't meet their 50% rule ... they will be gone, as well. If they meet the margin without a board op, then you'll be gone ... and the talent will either get along or it will be "nationalized" syndication.

Just hope that you've done a great job and appreciated it in the eyes you took that paycheck from. Then, you'll honestly know whether you made the cut ... or not. Gentlemen, that's what's it's all about. "Nothing personal ... it's just business."

Good luck.
 
P.S. - They cut the guy doing 15 stations for them because they are developing "singlular talent" to cover 150, 300 or 600 stations.

No more "outsourcing" or as little as possible.

Now, here's a scary thought ... but entirely possible. Let's say you didn't get to be Ryan Seacrest's board op. OK ... maybe you'd best to be looking to be Ryan Seacrest's SALES MANAGER, because here's what next:

Get on 600 stations like Rush Limbaugh (a Premiere talent for Clear Channel.) Get HUGE sums of money, but RETAIN THE RIGHTS TO YOUR SHOW. Then, UP THE FEES that station's pay you and Clear Channel keeps much of the advertising revenue.

Net result: Make $400-million dollars in 8 years.

OR ... go ahead and $ell your show to Clear Channel. That's right ... PAY them to run it. YOU do the ad sales and keep it. Make $400-million.

Wait ...

That's already being done.

Sorry. But it is. Clear Channel then operates huge flamethrowers that it can unload to the next rich "radio company" at a high price, with little expense and overhead ... with a sizeable income from local spot sales while the "shows" make huge gobs of money and are sold to stations ...
 
oaktree said:
...maybe you'd best to be looking to be Ryan Seacrest's SALES MANAGER, because here's what next: Get on 600 stations like Rush Limbaugh (a Premiere talent for Clear Channel.)

BTW, will Ryan Watercress have the same contract stipulation that El Rushbo has?
That is, if you want to air Ryan in middays (and who wouldn't? ::)), you also have
to air a three-hour weekend "best of." Or would that be a "worst of"? ;D
 
Who is Ryan Watercress? And I'm sorry but I just cannot stand Seacrest. I have held a grudge ever since he didn't want to answer my phone call back in the day when he was working at KYSR Star 98.7 in LA.

And this Clear Channel nicknamed: Cheap Channel is really true to it's name. No wonder there aren't really any new stations streaming that are owned by them. Everything I've heard about them makes them seem yicky. Their smooth jazz stations are almost all syndicated and it looks like they aren't going in a local direction any time soon which is sad. I'd rather hear local DJs compared to ones who don't even live in the market they reside in.

oldiesfan6479 said:
oaktree said:
...maybe you'd best to be looking to be Ryan Seacrest's SALES MANAGER, because here's what next: Get on 600 stations like Rush Limbaugh (a Premiere talent for Clear Channel.)

BTW, will Ryan Watercress have the same contract stipulation that El Rushbo has?
That is, if you want to air Ryan in middays (and who wouldn't? ::)), you also have
to air a three-hour weekend "best of." Or would that be a "worst of"? ;D
 
Any company that brazenly expects/demands that they turn a 50% profit doesn't deserve to be in business anyway. Capitalism's one thing, but this is something else. (Yeah, I do understand supply and demand...but we also know how many stations are getting ratings BY DEFAULT these days, as there's nothing else to listen to.) The next time I listen to a CC station will be the day the ceremonial plug is pulled. With the high profit expectations in place, it really shouldn't be long.

Reminds me of the joke Steve Martin used to tell, that went somthing like this..."So, if I charge $100 dollars a ticket and sell two thousand tickets, I could make XXXX. But if I sold 2,000 tickets at $1 MILLION a ticket, I could make XXXX. One show, goodbye."

The earlier post about selling off the underperformers at CC, YES, get those stations back into the hands of REAL radio people before the CC Napalm poisons and self-destructs the rest of the industry. (And you know CBS is watching this model with keen interest...if it works, even remotely [pardon the pun,] guess who'll be next on that bandwagon.)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom