Dave FM needs to play more Jack And Diane and Pour Some Sugar On Me. KOIT, The Breeze, and even 80s Plus just aren't playing these songs enough! Steal some audience, Dave! It doesn't hurt to play more Dave Matthews Band and Hootie And The Blowfish, either.😁😁Oooooh Dave-FM............your tanking.............![]()
Not sure if there is a gain, ratings-wise or monetary-wise, for KRBQ shifting to classic hip-hop as 102.1 Jams.Audacy has been making some puzzling moves.
Probably doing better with female listeners as well, which adds to its advertiser appeal. Alt is overwhelmingly male in appeal as currently presented; Lilith Fair isn't walking back through that door anytime soon.Dave FM is getting the same ratings as they did with alternative music with no jocks, I think they are fine.
Just look at the PUR for any daypart or demo and compare with other markets.The two main things that stand out is (1) the number of AC/Hot AC stations that are doing well, not just in 12+, but also 25-54.
And (2) the only classic hits/classic rock/ adult hits station in the Top 10 is KOSF. And it's not a player in 25-54.
I don't know for sure, but my sense is that radio usage in this market is lower than typical.
It’s the Bay Area culture.What do market watchers think is the reason for KDFC's success? It is a rare market where classical is nearly a Top 5 ranked station.
What do market watchers think is the reason for KDFC's success? It is a rare market where classical is nearly a Top 5 ranked station.
Or maybe prolonged panel issues of the sort that have propelled a classical music station to No. 1 in Charlotte recently? Classical WNCH is a solid fourth here in the NH/VT Upper Valley, but that's likely due to an older population and many wealthy older white males associated with Dartmouth College and a major regional hospital. This is a market in which the top three are NPR news/talk, classic rock and country.My sense is it's related to the low usage of radio in the market. Nielsen measures share of usage.
Nielsen measures or derives share, rating, cume. Not just “share”.My sense is it's related to the low usage of radio in the market. Nielsen measures share of usage.
Rating is the percentage of ALL persons using radio. The sum of all station ratings yields Persons Using Radio, or the level of radio usage in a market or subset of the population.
Nationally, PUR ranges from around 4.5 to the low 5's on persons 12+. The differences all relate to the average commute time in each market.I understand all of that. My point is because radio usage is low, a typically smaller format appears to have a large share.
It's not as much the pandemic as the reduction in usage of home and workplace radios, making the average commute time in each metro survey area the key to PUR.We saw similar things during the pandemic with KING in Seattle.
High ratings or not, KDFC seems to have a more robust following given the high percentage of Asians in the Bay Area.It’s the Bay Area culture.